Calculating Q (first moment of inertia) above and below the neutral axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the first moment of inertia (Q) above and below the neutral axis for a specific cross-sectional shape made of two plates. The user initially finds a discrepancy between the calculated Q values, with Q above being 21.31 and Q below 30.03. After receiving feedback, the user realizes the mistake was in using the wrong distance from the centroid to the neutral axis for the Q above calculation. The correct distance should be 3.875 inches instead of 2.75 inches, leading to accurate Q values. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance received in resolving the issue.
tn3003
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is the cross sectional are of the shape: http://img38.imageshack.us/i/shapep.jpg/"
It's made of 2 10"x1" plates. (Picture is not to scale)

Q (first moment of inertia) above and below the neutral axis should be the same. For some reasons, my calculated Q above is not equal to Q below the NA.


The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the datum at the bottom

y bar = (10*0.5 + 10*6) / (20) = 3.25"

Q above = 7.75 * 2.75 = 21.31

Q below = 2.25 * (2.25/2) + 10 * 2.75 = 30.03

21.31 =/= 30.03

Someone please point out my mistake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Q below is corect, but in calculating thte Q above, the distance from the centroid to the N.A. is not 2.75. I think you may have just written down the wrong number.
 
OK I see it now. The distance for Q above should be 7.75"/2 = 3.875"
I was using the centroid of the whole shape, which gave me 7.75" - 5" = 2.75" and that's wrong.

Thank you PhanthomJay for not giving out the answer and let me figure it out myself. I really appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top