Calculating temperature with energy absorbed

  • Thread starter Thread starter pamelajanas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Temperature
AI Thread Summary
Two pitchers of lemonade, one made of copper and the other of glass, each weighing 965 g, absorb 1,000 J of energy in 10 minutes. Over one hour, they absorb a total of 6,000 J. The temperature increase for copper is calculated to be 16°C, while for glass it is 7.4°C, using the formula Q=mcΔT. The specific heat capacities for copper and glass are 3.8 x 10^2 J/(kg°C) and 8.4 x 10^2 J/(kg°C), respectively. The discussion concludes with a successful calculation of temperature changes for both materials.
pamelajanas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two pitchers of lemonade are left sitting in the sun at a picnic. One pitcher is made of copper and the other of glass. If each empty pitcher has a mass of 965 g and absorbs 1.0 x 10^3 J of energy 10.0 minutes, calculate the temperature increase of both empty pitchers in 1.0 hours.

Homework Equations



Q=mcΔT

The Attempt at a Solution



I still have no idea.
I tried rearranging the equations... and turning it into seconds...
My book says the answer for copper is 16°C and glass is 7.4°C.

Homework Statement


 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the pitchers absorb 1000J of energy in 10 minutes, how much energy will they absorb in 1 hour?
 
Xisune said:
If the pitchers absorb 1000J of energy in 10 minutes, how much energy will they absorb in 1 hour?

1000J in 10 minutes
60/10 = 6
∴ 6 x 1000 = 6000J in one hour?
 
Yes, now use that value for Q.
 
Xisune said:
Yes, now use that value for Q.

but isn't Q already 6000J/h? i am looking for temperature which is T.. so should i rearrange fore T= Q/mc ?

Q= heat or energy absorbed (J) = 6000J/h
m= mass (kg) = 0.965kg
c= specific heat capacity(J/(kg°C) ) = for copper: 3.8 x 10^2 and for glass: 8.4 x 10^2


right?
 
YAY! from that, I got it. Thank you! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top