Calculating the Required Force to Prevent Sliding on an Incline Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to prevent a smaller mass from sliding off a larger mass on an incline. The setup involves two objects, with the smaller mass leaning on the larger one, and the problem requires understanding the forces acting on both masses, including static and kinetic friction. The original calculations attempted to find the net forces but were deemed incorrect, particularly regarding the normal force and the application of friction coefficients. Clarification is sought on the positioning of the smaller mass and the relevance of kinetic friction, as the focus is on preventing movement. The consensus suggests treating the blocks as a system and ensuring the applied force exceeds the calculated static friction force to maintain stability.
stanbals
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two objects are on an incline plane. One object with larger mass is lower down on the plane. The other with smaller mass is leaning on the larger object but not one the surface of the plane. If both masses, the angle β, coefficient of static friction and the coefficient of kinetic friction are given what is the required Fa to keep the second block from falling.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've been working on this for several hours but have been unable to figure out the solution. What I tried doing was starting with the second block which I will call m.

Fnety = ma = 0
Fstatic friction - mgcosβ = 0
Fstatic = mg cosβ
\muFn=mgcosβ
Fn=mgcosβ/\mu

Fnet x = ma = mgcosβ/\mu - mgsingβ
a = gcosβ/\muk - gsinβ

Then for both blocks combined I did

Fnety = ma = 0
Fn - (M+m)gcosβ = 0
Fn = (M+m)gcosβ

Fnetx = Fa - Fkinetic friction = (M+m)a
Fa = \mus(M+m)gcosβ + (M+m)(gcosβ\muk - gsinβ)

This is the answer I got but my teacher told me its wrong, can anyone give me some help as to where I am messing it up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand the set-up, and I doubt that I'm the only one, could you explain it more or give a diagram? I don't understand where the smaller mass is. Is it on top of the the other mass? If not, how is it resting on the plane without being in contact with the plane, by rollers or something? How the smaller block is resting is very critical.

Another thing that I don't understand from the problem description is why you would need the coefficient of kinetic friction. The whole point is for the blocks not to move.
 
The photo I attached is of the given diagram. The smaller mass is leaning on the larger mass but above the ground. The coefficient of static and kinetic were given, I assumed the static was for between the two masses and the kinetic was for between the larger mass and the plane.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 427
Treat the two blocks as a system, don't split it up. So I guess what you want to do is figure out what force in addition to static friction will prevent the blocks from sliding. I agree with most of what you've done in that case; however, the normal force should not have both masses, but the force of gravity should. Then make an inequality showing that the applied force must be greater than or equal to your result.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top