"Calculating the Velocity of an Arrow Hitting Hay

  • Thread starter Thread starter lking226
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the original velocity of a 1kg arrow that penetrates 47.0cm into hay with an average frictional force of 2500.0N, the work done by the friction must be determined using the formula W = fd. The work done is negative since it represents a loss in kinetic energy as the arrow comes to a stop. Applying the kinetic energy-work theorem, the equation simplifies to W = -1/2mvi^2, where vf is zero. The negative work indicates a decrease in kinetic energy, confirming that the original velocity can be calculated from the work done against friction. Understanding these principles allows for the accurate determination of the arrow's initial velocity.
lking226
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1kg arrow hits a bail of hay and penetrates 47.0cm. The average frictional force of the hay on the arrow is 2500.0N. What was the original velocity of the arrow?


Homework Equations


Ffr = uk x Fn


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm completely lost, can someone please walk me through this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well we know that,

W = fdcos(theta).

cos(theta) is going to go to 1 so,

W = fd.

We're given then average force and the distance so we can solve for the work done.

After you've done that I want you to think about the kinetic energy - work theorem ;)
 
is the kinetic energy-work theorem net work = change in kinetic energy?
so then, w = 1/2mvf^2-1/2mvi^2, but vf is 0 because the arrow is stopped in the hay so really w = -1/2mvi^2. does that stay negative?
 
lking226 said:
is the kinetic energy-work theorem net work = change in kinetic energy?
so then, w = 1/2mvf^2-1/2mvi^2, but vf is 0 because the arrow is stopped in the hay so really w = -1/2mvi^2. does that stay negative?

Yes, the work done is negative, because the kinetic energy decreaes (in this case all the way to zero, so that the change in kinetic energy is just the negative of how much there was to start with).
 
got it, thanks guys!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top