Calculating Thermal Expansion in a Steel Cable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the temperature increase (θ) that causes a steel cable to bend when stretched between two poles. The initial calculations led to an absurd result of 126 °C due to miscalculations, particularly in not dividing the change in length by the original length. Participants pointed out that the correct approach involves using the linear expansion coefficient for steel and correcting the calculations. After addressing these errors, one participant arrived at a more reasonable temperature increase of approximately 30.7 °C. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculations in thermal expansion problems.
has1993
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As shown in attachment a steel cable is stretched between two poles. In 20°C temperature the cable remains horizontal (the length of the cable 10m). At a higher temperature θ°C the cable bends like in attachment. The lamp hanging from the mid-point could be thought as weightless. The linear expansion coefficient for steel is 12 * 10^-6. What is the value of θ?


Homework Equations



l' = l [1 + αθ] ------- 1


The Attempt at a Solution



I first used pythagorian to find the expanded length so,

L^2 = 25 + 64 * 10^-4

that gives L = 5.0064
so the total expanded length 2L = 10.0128

And applying it to the (1) equation
I get a value for θ = 126 °C ! obviously absurd.

So anyone got a hint on what I'm doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Figure.jpg
    Figure.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 430
Physics news on Phys.org
Pls post the steps between calculating the expanded length and getting theta.
 
has1993 said:
L^2 = 25 + 64 * 10^-4

that gives L = 5.00064
so the total expanded length 2L = 10.00128

And applying it to the (1) equation
I get a value for θ = 126 °C ! obviously absurd.

So anyone got a hint on what I'm doing wrong?

You miss some zeroes. I think it is just typing error. I got the same result a you.
Edit: We both forgot to divide the change of length by the original length. ehild
 
Last edited:
Strange - I get 30.7C.
Fractional expansion = 0.000128 = 1.28E-4. Dividing by 12E-6 gives a bit over 10.
 
haruspex said:
Strange - I get 30.7C.
Fractional expansion = 0.000128 = 1.28E-4. Dividing by 12E-6 gives a bit over 10.

You are right, I forgot to divide by Lo. :redface:

ehild
 
Thks guys. It really helped. I think I've made some miscalculations. But now i get it. :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top