Calculating thickness of a cast iron cylinder carrying pressure of 30Nmm^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the thickness of a cast iron cylinder under a pressure of 30 N/mm² with a bore of 300 mm and a working stress limit of 25 N/mm². The formula used for the calculation is t = pd/2σ1, leading to an initial calculation of 180 mm, which was deemed excessively large. Further attempts to recalculate resulted in confusion over unit conversions and potential errors in the equations used. Participants emphasized the importance of checking quantities and units to avoid mistakes in the calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that the thickness should be verified with correct parameters to ensure accuracy.
joe465
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A cast-iron cylinder of 300mm bore carries a pressure of 30 Newtons per square
millimetre; what should be its thickness for a unit working stress of 25 Newtons per
square millimetre?


2. Homework Equations

ó1 = pd/2t

t=pd/2tó1


3. The Attempt at a Solution

t=pd/2tó1

t= 30*300/2*25

=180mm

Its got to be wrong as its way too big but I am unsure on where I am going wrong, any help would be much appreciated.

Heres another attempt

ó1/pd=2t

25/(30*3000) = 2t

2t = 0.00277778

t= 0.0014mm (4dp)

Maybes this one, I am not sure.

Thanks, Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you check the quantities and units in the question. Also I think you have some typos in your relevant equations and solutions.
 
Thankyou for your reply.

This is the best i can get.

Assuming that the cylinder is a thin cylinder

o1 = pd/2t

where o1=Stress on the cylinder

This stress is the circumferential stress on the cylinder

p= Pressure

d=Diameter of he cylinder bore

t= thickness

Now we have been given

o1=25 N/mm^2

P=30N/mm^2

d=300mm

SO

We know

o1 = pd/2t

So the design criteria for the thickness becomes

SO t=pd/2o1 = (30x300)/(2x25)= 9000/50 = 180

Its thickness should be 180 mm .
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top