Calculating Torque & Power of a Rotating Disk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating torque and power for a rotating disk with a radius of 0.5 m, subjected to a force of 50 N at its periphery and rotating at an angular velocity of 100 rad/s. The torque is calculated as 25 Nm, derived from the formula Torque = radius x Force. Power is determined using the equation Power = Torque x Angular Velocity, resulting in 2500 Nm/s. The confusion regarding the treatment of radians is clarified, emphasizing that radians are unitless and do not affect the dimensional analysis of the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as torque and power
  • Familiarity with angular velocity and its units
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Ability to apply formulas for rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational dynamics in detail
  • Learn about the relationship between torque, power, and angular velocity
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of torque and power calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers working with rotating systems, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of torque and power in mechanical systems.

kostantina
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I am calculating torque and power for a disk of radius 0.5 m that is subjected to a force of 50 N at its periphery and is rotating at angular velocity of 100 rad/s. Find torque and power.[/B]

Homework Equations



Torque= radius x Force = 0.5m *50N = 25Nm

Power= dW/dt= F*w(omega)= 25Nm * 100 rad/sec ... WHy the solutions book has an answer 2500 Nm/s. Why did they ignore the radians. I was thinking to convert the radians into meters or something like that. What am I not understanding here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radians are a sort of "unitless" unit. They arise out of ratios of like units, such as the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its radius (with suitable unitless constants involved). So when they get mixed up with "real" units they have a tendency to disappear. So, rad*m = m, rad*kg = kg, and so on.
 
Thank you for the response. It makes sense now. Will do further research on this to make sure I understand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K