Calculating transition rate between nljm resolved states

Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
I know how to calculate transition rates between nl resolved states in a hydrogen-like atom, but I don't know how to calculate transition rates between nljm states.

I know that dipole transition rate is
\frac{32}{3}\frac{\pi^3 \alpha c}{\lambda^3}\left<\psi_1|\mathbf{d}|\psi_2\right>
The matrix elements on the right can be separated into a radial integral and an angular part. The radial part is
\int R_{nl} R_{n'l'} r^3\,\mathrm{d}r
If we pretend that spin doesn't exit, the angular part goes something like
\iint {Y_l^m}^{*} Y_1^{0,\pm 1} Y_{l'}^{m'} \sin(\theta) \,d\theta\,d\phi
I can solve this using Clebsch Gordan coefficients, and it seems to give the right answer. But, I have no idea what to do when I add in spin angular momentum. It seems this integral doesn't make sense if I replace l with with 1/2 integer j.

I tried some various things, and I ended up with something that gave the right answer in some cases but not in others. I'm always off by some multiple of some rational. I know it has to do with degeneracy and angular momentum addition, but I can't figure it out. Any resources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When including spin, ##j## replaces ##l## in the angular part.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top