Calculating Uncertainties in Volume and Density Measurements - Tips and Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter kayleech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating uncertainties in volume and density measurements using specific diameter and thickness values. The user successfully calculated the uncertainties for squared diameters but struggles with incorporating thickness into the volume formula. They attempted to use an equation for uncertainty propagation but are unsure about its application and how to express their results clearly. Guidance is provided on using partial derivatives for uncertainty calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding the total differential. The conversation highlights the complexities of uncertainty calculations in physical measurements.
kayleech
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
These are my measurements:
D1 = 5.381 +/- 0.001 cm
D2 = 2.070 +/- 0.001 cm
t = 0.304 +/- 0.005 cm
m = 40.04 +/- 0.005 g

I then calculated the uncertainties of D1 and D2 squared:
D1^2 = 28.95 +/- 0.01 cm^2
D2^2 = 4.285 +/- 0.004 cm^2
D1^2 - D2^2 = 24.67 +/- 0.01 cm^2

Up until there, I'm pretty sure everything is correct.

Than I had to calculate the volume of the washer by using the equation:
(pi x (D1^2 - D2^2) x t)/4

And I basically got stuck there. I'm not sure how to calculate my uncertainties when multiplying by t and so on.

I tried it out by first adding the uncertainties of Dtotal and t (when multiplied) by using this equation:
Dtotal^2 x t +/- Dtotal^2 x t x (change in Dtotal/Dtotal + change in t/t)

That gave me a volume of 5.9 +/- 0.1 cm^3... which I then used to calculate a density of 6.8 +/- 0.1 g/cm^3.

Does this seem correct or what am I doing wrong? I also don't know how to express my answers while doing the calculations; as in, I have random numbers from subtracting my givens (while subtracting my uncertainties) that I don't end up using.

I'm really confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you plus or minus something? Dtotal^2 x t +/- Dtotal^2?

Do you know how partial derivatives work? You want to use

\left( \sum_{i=1}^n \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \Delta x_i \right)^2 \right)^{1/2}

where f is the function you are evaluating, in this case the volume, the x_i's are each variable (d1, d2, ...), and the delta xi's are the uncertainties in each variable.
 
I'm confused how to even use that equation though!
 
I figured it out using this website:
http://www.rit.edu/~uphysics/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart2.html#mixtures .

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, as long as you got it. They have the total differential a little bit below, I was posting the magnitude of it (because an error vector is worthless). I like taking the magnitude of the total differential because it comes directly from vector calculus, and always works.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top