Calculating voltage across resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter ingram010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the voltage at point X in a circuit with a 500V source, a 1MΩ resistor (R1), and a 10kΩ resistor (R2), use the voltage divider formula: V = 500 * R2 / (R1 + R2). For the first scenario, substituting the values gives X = 4.76V. In a more complex circuit with additional resistors (R3 and R4), the same principles apply, requiring the calculation of total resistance and current before determining voltages at points X, Y, and Z. Ohm's law (V = IR) is essential for these calculations, ensuring accurate voltage readings across each resistor. Understanding these formulas allows for effective voltage analysis in resistor networks.
ingram010
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am looking for a formula to work out the following-


500v---/\/\/\/\/---X---/\/\/\/\/---0v
1megohm 10kohm

what is X?

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. Its not clear at least to me what the problem is, is X an unknown voltage. If so
use V=iR first compute i using the total series resistance (here the sum of 1Mohm and 10Kohm.
Then V is just the i*the resistance over which you want to find voltage.

or all in one v=500*R/(R+r) This is just voltage divider eqn. Thats the voltage across the first resistance, voltage across the second would be:

500*r/(R+r), if your looking for the value of x, this would be the one to use.
 
Last edited:
voltage calculation

Hi, on reflection it isn't very clear. Sorry.


how about this-

500v---\/\R1\/\----X----\/\R2\/\---0v

If R1 = 1Mohm and R2 = 10Kohm
what is the voltage at X?

Or this one -

500v---\/\R1\/\--X--\/\R2\/\--Y--\/\R3\/\--Z--\/\R4\/\---0v

If R1 = 1Mohm, R2 = 10Kohm, R3 = 10Kohm and R4 = 10Kohm
what is the voltage at X,Y and Z?

is there a simple calculation for this problem?
 
first find the electric current
then use Ohm's law
V=IR
500=I(106+103)
I = ?
1
V = IR
X - 0 = I(R2)

2
V = IR
500 - X = I(R1)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top