Calculation involving Parallel Plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge on the outer surface of a parallel plate capacitor modeled after a living cell membrane. The membrane has a surface area of 5.0 mm², a thickness of 10 nm, and a dielectric constant of 5.0, with an internal potential of -60.0 mV. Initial calculations yielded a charge of approximately -1.33 x 10^-25 C, leading to a calculated number of monovalent ions on the surface. Participants clarify the relationship between voltage, charge, and capacitance, emphasizing the need for correct formulas involving the dielectric constant and the role of polar molecules in the dielectric material. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding capacitance in biological contexts.
popsune
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've a problem with this question and I'm not sure if I've worked it out correctly.

This is the question:

The membrane that surrounds a certain type of living cell has a surface area of 5.0 mm2 and a thickness of 10 nm. Assume that the membrane behaves like a parallel plate capacitor and has a dielectric constant of 5.0. If the potential inside the membrane is -60.0 mV with respect to the outside how much charge resides on the outer surface? If the charge is due to monovalent ions, how many such ions are present on the outer surface?
Epsilon0 = 8.85 X 10-12 C2/(N.m2)
e = 1.6 X 10-19 C

This is my working:

V=Q/Ak(Epsilon0)d
-60X10^-3=Q/(5.0X10^-6)X5.0X(8.85X10^-12)X(10X10^-9)
Q=-1.3275X10^-25C

Charge of 1 electron=1.6X10^-19C
No of ions = 1.3275X10-25/1.6X10^-19=8.296X10^-7
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, popsune. Keep in mind that C = epslon * A / d as an approximation that matches your homework problem, and that epsilon = epsilon0 * epsilonR
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF, popsune. Keep in mind that C = epslon * A / d as an approximation that matches your homework problem, and that epsilon = epsilon0 * epsilonR
Hi thanks for the reply. But can you elaborate on your explanation, cos I don't really get it.
 
What Berkeman is trying to say is that your expression for V is wrong .
V = Q/C right ?

Now for a parallel plate capacitor ,
C = \frac{\epsilon_0\epsilon_rA}{d}

So Q/C becomes ...
 
arunbg said:
What Berkeman is trying to say is that your expression for V is wrong .
V = Q/C right ?

Now for a parallel plate capacitor ,
C = \frac{\epsilon_0\epsilon_rA}{d}

So Q/C becomes ...

Thanks, but what is Epsilon R?
 
\epsilon_{r} is the relative permitivity of the dielectric medium between the plates. A dielectric material is one which contains polar molecules. The polarity of the molecules will be randomly orientate when no electric field is applied. However, when an electric field is applies the material becomes polarised (each polar molecule is arranged the same), this effect decreases the effective electric field. However, as the electric field strength in inversly proportional to the capacitance, the capacitance increases due to these dipole moments (magnitude of charge multiplied by the distance between them). This is only a brief outline but I'm sure google could reveal more.

~H
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top