Calculation of leakage from a sealed room

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating room leakage based on pressure drop and airflow using the equation Q = 840*A*√(dP). The user encounters discrepancies between their results and another method for determining room leakage, prompting a request for assistance. Key points include the importance of error analysis and the distinction between turbulent and laminar flow in leakage calculations. It is suggested that measuring leak rate versus pressure difference may yield more accurate results, especially for small leaks. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately assessing room leakage due to varying leak geometries and flow conditions.
Ioannis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

I am trying to calculate the openings of a sealed room according to a pressure drop in a specific time.
I have the following equation:

Q = 840*A*√(dP)

Q: differential airflow in liters/sec
A: room leakage in m2
dP: differential pressure in Pa

So, if for example we have a room of 500m3 at atmospheric pressure 101325 Pa and we increase its pressure** by 80 Pa and then measure how much time it will need to decrease for 30Pa we can calculate the differential airflow by the following:

(Psi + Pstart) * V1 = (Psi + Pfinish) * V2 <=>
(101325+80) * V1 = (101325+50) * V2 <=>
V2 = 500.148m3

So because of a dP of 30Pa we get 148 liters difference.
If that dP occurred in 180sec then we get Q= 148/180 = 0.82 liters/sec
If we then put this number to the initial equation we get the room leakage.

My problem is that the results that I get are different from another method that is used to find the room leakage. So obviously there is a mistake in the above calculations but I can't find what.

**The pressure increase of the room is achieved by using a blower and the temperature is stable.

Does anyone have an idea?
Thank you in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do an error analysis of your method. Do an error analysis of the other method. Compare. If the error bands from two different methods do not overlap, there is a mistake somewhere. Keep digging until you find it.
 
I'm not following what you did; it looks like you posted an equation and then did somethjing else instead...which doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Can you explain what you did?

In either case, room leakage is difficult because it isn't just a function of leak area, but leak geometry; there is less flow through long skinny cracks than short fat ones.
 
This equation Q = 840*A*√(dP) comes from the 1999 Ashrae Application Handbook, Fire and Smoke Management. Since I am interested on finding the A which is the room leakage I need to find a way to calculate the Q which is the differential airflow.

That is where the second part of the calculation comes where I presume that if I know the initial volume of the room and the dP in a specific amount of time then I can calculate the differential air volume.
 
An error analysis will show that your method of measuring leakage is subject to large errors from multiple sources.

Your equation assumes turbulent flow through the leakage path, which is correct for large leaks. Small leaks will have laminar flow. I don't have a reference at hand, but if you search blower door testing of buildings, you will find a discussion of this. The effect of laminar vs turbulent flow is significant in a structure with leak rate over 100 times higher than your sealed room.

If you measure leak rate vs pressure difference, I expect you will find that leak rate is linearly proportional to pressure difference. Since your leak rate is so low, you might be better off to measure flow rate using compressed air with an orifice. A little 1/2 hp air compressor will flow the liter per second that you need.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top