Calculation of the velocity of a Spaceship moving Relativistically

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a spaceship traveling to Alpha Centauri, given that it covers 4.3 light years in 4.3 years onboard. Participants clarify the use of Lorentz transformations to solve the problem, emphasizing the need to analyze two key events: the spaceship leaving Earth and arriving at Alpha Centauri. The conversation also addresses a typo regarding the time elapsed, which was initially noted as "4.e" but corrected to "4.3." The importance of using the inverse Lorentz transformation for accurate calculations is highlighted, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. Overall, the thread focuses on applying relativistic physics principles to determine the spaceship's speed and the observed velocity of protons ejected from the ship.
Owen-
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spaceship travel from Earth \alpha-Centauri (4.3 light years away) at a constant velocity. If the time elapsed onboard during the journey is 4.e years, what is the speed of the spaceship?

The spaceship is powered by a drive which works by ejecting protons behind the ship at a velocity relative to the ship of c/2. At what velocity would a person on Earth observer the protons to be travelling, just as the spaceship reached constant velocity as it passed Earth on its way to \alpha-Centauri

Homework Equations



\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}
\beta = \frac{v}{c}
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-\frac{x \times v^2}{c^2})

The Attempt at a Solution


x'=\gamma(4.3-vt)
4.3=\gamma(t-\frac{x \times v^2}{c^2})

Well essentially I couldn't see any way to cancel things with simultaneous equations, and without one other variable known I assumed it to be impossible, unless they want the answer to be in terms of something. Is this correct? Any help, even a hint in the right direction would be much appreciated. :)

Thanks in advance,
Owen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any way to fix the typo in the title? :S
 
Owen- said:

Homework Statement



A spaceship travel from Earth \alpha-Centauri (4.3 light years away) at a constant velocity. If the time elapsed onboard during the journey is 4.e years, what is the speed of the spaceship?
What does 4.e mean?

The spaceship is powered by a drive which works by ejecting protons behind the ship at a velocity relative to the ship of c/2. At what velocity would a person on Earth observer the protons to be travelling, just as the spaceship reached constant velocity as it passed Earth on its way to \alpha-Centauri

Homework Equations



\gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}
\beta = \frac{v}{c}
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-\frac{x \times v^2}{c^2})

The Attempt at a Solution


x'=\gamma(4.3-vt)
4.3=\gamma(t-\frac{x \times v^2}{c^2})

Well essentially I couldn't see any way to cancel things with simultaneous equations, and without one other variable known I assumed it to be impossible, unless they want the answer to be in terms of something. Is this correct? Any help, even a hint in the right direction would be much appreciated. :)

Owen- said:
Any way to fix the typo in the title? :S
What typo?
 
You can do this problem using length contraction and time dilation, but the simplest and most foolproof method of doing it is to apply the LT directly.
Let S (coordinates x,t) represent the rest frame of the Earth and α-centauri, and let S' (coordinates x',t') represent the rest frame of the spaceship. There are two events that are relevant:
I. Spaceship leaves earth
II. Spaceship arrives at α-centauri.

The coordinates in the S and S' frames of reference for the two events are as follows:

I. x = 0, t = 0, x' = 0, t' = 0

II. x = 4.3c, t = ?, x' = 0, t' = 4.

where x' = 0 corresponds to the location of the spaceship in its own rest frame of reference. For this problem, it is more convenient to work with the inverse LT:
x=\gamma (x'+vt')
t=\gamma (t'+\frac{vx'}{c^2})

You can use the first of these equations to solve part 1 for the velocity of the spaceship by substituting in the parameters for event 2 (event 1 already satisfies these equations identically).
 
What does 4.e mean?
sorry it should read 4.3. That might have caused some confusion.

What typo?
I'm just being stupid, there is none - Relativistically looked incorrect to me on 2nd glance :P

Chestermiller, thanks! I think I can do this now, wasn't considering needing the LT at the two distinct points - its a lot easier now that I'm looking at it properly! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top