Can a 1.1 eV Proton Tunnel Through a 2.4 eV Barrier?

  • Thread starter Thread starter j2dabizo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Tunneling
j2dabizo
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.1 eV electron has a 10-4 probability of tunneling through a 2.4 eV potential barrier. What is the probability of a 1.1 eV proton tunneling through the same barrier

Homework Equations



eq 1) T= [1 + V02 sinh2(kL)/4E(V0-E)]-1

or if (kL)>>1 we use eq 2) T= 16(E/V0(1-E/V0)e-2kL


k= (2m(V0-E)1/2/hbar

The Attempt at a Solution



Solving for k.
we know m of electron= 5.11E5 ev
Vo = 2.4
E= 1.1
hbar = 6.5281E-16 ev*s...

so solve for k of electron we get 1.7512E18 s-1, need it in terms of m-1, so we divide by 3.0E8m/s = 5.8373E9 m-1

solve for L in equation 2 t= (7.333)(0.5417)e-1.1675E10m-1(L)...
L= 3.9392E-10m

now i have found L,

nned to find k of the proton so..

k=[2(938.27E6ev)(1.3ev)]1/2/6.5821E-16ev*s = then divide by 3.0E8 m/s = 2.5013E11m-1

so kL for proton = (205.1062)

when I plug this kL number in eq 1 or 2...once I do the e-2(kL) or sinh(kL)2 i get an error message and i can't calculate the T...

Help please this is killing me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's because e^(-410) is zero for all practical purposes (i.e. experiments that could detect it today or in some ten years of time ahead).
If you really need it, e^(-410) \approx 10^(-178)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top