Can a hypothesis be partially verified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the verification of a hypothesis stating that values exhibit a linear trend before plateauing. The data showed a linear trend but did not reach a plateau, leading to questions about whether the hypothesis is supported, falsified, or partially supported. One viewpoint suggests the hypothesis could be seen as partially correct, as the linear trend is supported while the plateau prediction is not. There is also a consideration that extending the measurement range might eventually reveal the plateau. Ultimately, the conclusion leans towards the hypothesis being partially supported based on the current data.
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I have a practical report and I have a hypothesis which basically states that the values exhibit a linear trend before eventually plateauing (levelling out).

The graph did exhibit a linear trend but it did not plateau. Does this mean my hypothesis has been supported, falsified or partially supported?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would be inclined to say that your hypothesis was partially correct. I wonder, however, if perhaps your hypothesis isn't a conglomeration of two separate hypotheses. The first, predicting a linear trend, is supported by your data, while the second, predicting a plateau, is falsified.
 
Mayn't you reach that plateau if extending the measurement range?

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top