Can a shear force diagram be a function of applied load P?

AI Thread Summary
In shear force and bending moment diagrams, shear force (V) and bending moment (M) are typically plotted as functions of displacement (x) along the beam's length. The discussion clarifies that asking for diagrams as a function of the applied load P implies plotting V or M against P, which is not standard practice. The shear force is influenced by the applied loads and the beam's support conditions, meaning that V and M are fundamentally functions of x. Doubling the load P results in a proportional increase in shear forces throughout the beam. Therefore, shear force diagrams and plots of shear force versus load P are not equivalent concepts.
annas425
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
…or must it be of displacement, x?

In a shear force, V (or bending moment, M) diagram, isn't it usually the shear force (or bending moment) plotted as a function of displacement, x?

When someone asks to "draw the shear force and bending moment diagrams as a function of the applied load P," I'm assuming that means to put V (or, in the case of moment, M) on the y-axis (dependent variable) and P on the x-axis (independent variable)?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shear force and bending moment are plotted along the length of the beam. The shear force is determined by the loads applied to the beam and the location and nature of the beam supports. If the x-coordinate is measured along the length of the beam, then V and M are functions of x.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
SteamKing said:
Shear force and bending moment are plotted along the length of the beam. The shear force is determined by the loads applied to the beam and the location and nature of the beam supports. If the x-coordinate is measured along the length of the beam, then V and M are functions of x.

Okay, so "shear force diagram" and "plot of shear force vs. load P" are not synonymous, correct??
 
I don't know what the phrase "plot of shear force vs. load P" even means. If you double the load P, then you'll double all of the shear forces in the beam.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top