Can anyone PLEASE explain axis rotation?

AI Thread Summary
Axis rotation involves using a rotation matrix to transform coordinates in three-dimensional space. For a 45-degree rotation about the y-axis, the matrix is derived from trigonometric functions, specifically cosine and sine of the angle. The resulting matrix is structured to maintain the y-coordinate while adjusting the x and z coordinates based on the rotation. Understanding the derivation of this matrix clarifies how points in 3D space are affected by rotation. The provided link offers further insights into the theory behind these transformations.
m0nk3y
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
So I am asked to rotate by 45 degrees about the y-axis.

With the power of the net i found that it is;
[ cos(45) 0 sin (45);
0 1 0;
-sin(45) 0 cos(45)]

i really would like to understand HOW they get this.

THANKS in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, that helped alot! I get finally get it now!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top