Can Eigenfrequencies Explain Oscillatory Behavior in this Dynamical System?

xago
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
1.
Homework Statement

Someone studying a dynamical system in another field of science tells you that when they
attempt to model the experiment they’ve been examining they obtain the following set of
coupled ordinary differential equations.

\dot{x}= -Ax + By
\dot{y}= -Cx

In what follows you should assume that the material parameters A, B, C are all positive and
non zero. They also tell you that for certain material parameters (that is, for certain A, B, C)
they can sometimes obtain oscillatory behaviour, albeit damped, but sometimes they do not.
Note that x and y are restricted to be real.

(a) Show that this is indeed possible by solving for the normal modes of this system. That is,
find the eigenfrequencies for this system.

The Attempt at a Solution



So basically my idea of eigenfrequencies are the frequencies at which the system oscillates and all motion of the system is the superposition of these two frequencies/motions. The first thing I'm doing is putting the constants into a matrix:

| -A B | |x| = |0|
| C 0 | |y|= |0|

Then i solve for determinant and get the eigenfrequencies. Basically I just wanted to know if I'm on the right track and this will help me prove that this is solving for the normal modes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normal modes imply:

x(t) = D e^{i\omega t}

So you need to plug in similar functions for x and y. Then you solve for the eigenfrequences.
 
Shouldn't the function you plug in be of the form of a solution for a damped oscillation?
 
If \omega is imaginary then it will be damped.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top