Can someone help me find the equivalent resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent resistance of a circuit with multiple resistors. The user is struggling to arrive at the correct answer, consistently getting 2.07 ohms. Several participants point out potential errors in the user's approach, particularly regarding the arrangement of resistors in series and parallel. They suggest a method of redrawing the circuit after each calculation to better visualize the relationships among the remaining resistors. This strategy aims to clarify the connections and assist in accurately determining the equivalent resistance.
Gonger
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
For this question I am pretty sure I am doing everything right but I just can't get the right answer. Diagram below. This is the question. Find the equivalent resistance of the circuit shown in the diagram, where R1 = 3 Ω, R2 = 2 Ω, R3 = 4 Ω, R4 = 1 Ω, R5 = 1 Ω, R6 = 2 Ω, and R7 = 2 Ω.

What I did was R4 and R3 in parallel, R6 and R5 in series, R1 and R2 in series, R12 and R7 in parallel, then R65 and R43 in series together, and finally R6543 in series with R127. I keep getting 2.07 ohms as my answer. If you can make out what I said can anyone help me?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • prob06v3.gif
    prob06v3.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 906
Physics news on Phys.org
One problem I see with your calculations is you took R1 and R2 in series, but R2 is in series with R3//R4

R1 will be one of the last ones you can reduce
 
OK I still can't get it

I have R3/R4 in parallel. Then I took that in series with R2. Then I took that in series with R6//R5. Then all of that in series with R7. And finally that in parallel with R1. Does all that sound right?
 
Gonger said:
OK I still can't get it

I have R3/R4 in parallel. Then I took that in series with R2. Then I took that in series with R6//R5.

Are you sure about that?

Gonger said:
Then all of that in series with R7. And finally that in parallel with R1. Does all that sound right?

Are you sure about that?

Tip: Once you replace two resistors with an equivalent resistance, draw the circuit again with that replacement. That way, you will be able to see the relationships amongst the remaining resistors, instead of visualising it all in your head.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top