Can x=8sin2t+6cos2t be proven as S.H.M. using a second derivative?

AI Thread Summary
The equation x = 8sin(2t) + 6cos(2t) can be proven to undergo simple harmonic motion (S.H.M.) by taking its second derivative. The first derivative is dx/dt = 20cos(2t + tan^(-1)(3/4)), and the second derivative is d²x/dt² = -40sin(2t + tan^(-1)(3/4)). This shows that the motion is periodic and can be expressed in the form x = Csin(ωt + φ), confirming it is S.H.M. The coefficients of sine and cosine yield the same angular frequency, ω² = 4, which is crucial for establishing S.H.M. Thus, the original equation meets the criteria for simple harmonic motion.
Cpt Qwark
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that:
x=8sin2t+6cos2t is undergoing S.H.M.
(Not too sure about how to prove for solution.)

Homework Equations


Solution for S.H.M. x=asin(nt+α) is \frac{d^{2}x}{dy^{2}}=-n^2x

The Attempt at a Solution


r=\sqrt{8^{2}+6^{2}}=10\\α=tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4}\\∴x=10sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
Differentiating with respect to time: \frac{dx}{dt}=20cos(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})\\\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=-40sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cpt Qwark said:
Solution for S.H.M. x=asin(nt+α) is \frac{d^{2}x}{dy^{2}}=-n^2x

...

∴x=10sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
Right. Adding any two sinusoidal functions of the same frequency will result in another sinusoidal function, regardless of their amplitudes.

If you solve the SHM differential equation, \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-kx you will get x=C_1\sin(\sqrt{k}t)+C_2\cos(\sqrt{k}t) and it because of the above fact that you can write the solution as x=C_3\sin(\sqrt{k}t+C_4)
 
Last edited:
Cpt Qwark said:

Homework Statement


Prove that:
x = 8sin2t+6cos2t is undergoing S.H.M.
You can just take this equation, compute x', then x'', and see that ω2 must = 4 by equating sine and cosine coefficients. Both yield the same answer ω2 = 4. Had the sine & cosine coeff. yielded differing ω then x(t) would not be shm.
 
Take the second derivative of the given expression and express it in terms of x. The result would eliminate sin and cos and will prove your answer in form of a=-nx.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top