Can You Catch the Bus If It Starts Accelerating While You're Running to It?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a scenario where a person runs to catch a bus that starts accelerating while they are en route. The individual is 16 meters away from the bus, which is stationary at a traffic light, and runs at a speed of 6.0 m/s while the bus accelerates at 1.0 m/s². The conclusion reached is that the person can catch the bus in 4 seconds after running 24 meters. The original poster seeks a more algebraic method for solving the problem rather than relying on trial and error. The proposed algebraic approach involves setting the displacements of both the runner and the bus equal to each other, allowing for the calculation of time.
mat331760298
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1. You are running late for your bus that is 100m away. Luckily it is stopped at a traffic light. When you are 16m from the bus, running at your max speed of 6.0m/s the light changes and the bus starts accelerating at 1.0m/s². Do you catch the bus? If so, how far did you have to run to catch it?



2. v1= initial velocity
v2= final velocity
a= acceleration
t= time
d= displacement

1)v2=v1 + at
2)d= 0.5(v2+v1)t
3)d=v1t+0.5at²
4)d=v2t-0.5at²
5)[v2]²=[v1]²+2ad

3. I have answered the question and got that you do catch the bus in 4 seconds time and have to run 24m, but i solved using trial and error. I would like to know how to solve this question using a more algebraic method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Assuming you caught your bus we can make the two displacements equal each other:
displacement of bus = displacement of you - 16m
d1 = d2-16
v1t+0.5at² = v2t-16

Then solve for t. There's probably other ways of solving this algebraically, this is just the first one I thought of.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top