Cartesian and Polar Coordinates

AI Thread Summary
Cartesian coordinates uniquely represent points as ordered pairs (x,y) based on their distances from two perpendicular axes, ensuring distinct mappings for each coordinate. In contrast, polar coordinates can lead to non-unique representations, as multiple polar coordinates can correspond to the same point, such as (r=0, θ=0) and (r=0, θ=π/3). While Cartesian coordinates excel in precision and efficiency for mathematical and physical calculations, they do not account for direction. Polar coordinates, however, incorporate both distance from the origin and angle, providing a more intuitive understanding of a point's location. Ultimately, the choice between these systems depends on the specific context and requirements of the task at hand.
Poweranimals
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
What are the differences in the "uniqueness" of the representations in Cartesian coordinates and in polar coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean this?

Distinct rectangular coordinates map to distinct points.
However, distinct polar coordinates don't always map to distinct points.
For example, (r = 0, \theta=0) and (r = 0, \theta=\pi/3) map to the same point.
 


Cartesian and polar coordinates are two different systems used to locate points on a plane. In Cartesian coordinates, points are represented by their distance from two perpendicular axes, the x-axis and the y-axis. This results in a unique representation of a point as an ordered pair (x,y). On the other hand, polar coordinates represent a point by its distance from the origin and the angle it forms with a fixed reference line. This results in a unique representation of a point as an ordered pair (r,θ).

The main difference between the uniqueness of representations in Cartesian and polar coordinates lies in the way they measure distance and direction. In Cartesian coordinates, distance is measured along two perpendicular axes, resulting in a rectangular grid. This allows for precise measurements and calculations, making it a preferred system in mathematics and physics. However, it does not take into account the direction of a point, as both the x and y coordinates can be positive or negative.

On the other hand, polar coordinates take into account both distance and direction, making it a more intuitive system in some cases. The distance from the origin is measured as the radius (r), while the direction is measured as the angle (θ). This allows for a unique representation of a point, as the radius and angle values cannot be negative. However, polar coordinates can be more complicated to work with in certain situations, especially in calculations involving trigonometric functions.

In conclusion, the uniqueness of representations in Cartesian and polar coordinates depends on the context and the purpose of the representation. Cartesian coordinates provide a precise and efficient way of representing points on a plane, while polar coordinates offer a more intuitive and unique representation of a point's distance and direction. Both systems have their own advantages and are useful in different scenarios.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top