Cartesian Product of two sets?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Cartesian product of two sets, A = [1,2) ∪ {3} and B = {1, (1/2), (1/3), ...} ∪ [-2,-1). The resulting set S = A x B requires accurate graphical representation. Participants clarify that the graph should include the intervals defined by A and B, as well as specific points like (3, 1/n). Key observations include the behavior of horizontal lines in the first quadrant and the inclusion/exclusion of edges in the fourth quadrant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Familiarity with interval notation and graphical representation
  • Basic knowledge of topology and graphing techniques
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notations and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research graphical representation of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Learn about interval notation and its implications in topology
  • Explore the concept of limits and behavior of functions approaching zero
  • Study the inclusion and exclusion principles in graphical representations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying topology, mathematicians interested in set theory, and educators teaching Cartesian products and graphical analysis.

DanielJackins
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to answer a bunch of topological questions based on the cartesian product of two sets, but I'm not entirely sure how to graph them out.

I have A = [1,2)U{3} and B = {1, (1/2), (1/3), ...}U[-2,-1). S = A x B, and I need the graph of S.

Could anyone help me with this?

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my original "sketch" but I'm almost positive it is wrong. http://i.imgur.com/NqOSnkh.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set up the interval [1,2) and the 3 along the x-axis. In a sense A is a set with 1 element -- a strange element but just one.

Set up the interval [-2,-1) along the y-axis.

I think each element of A X B will be those two intervals, plus the point (3,1/n). If that makes sense, it is easy enough to graph.
 
I'm sure you are closing in on this and you may be right. I am not sure. I am far from expert at this kind of thing, so you probably need a more reliable opinion.

You might look thru your class notes to see if anything similar was mentioned. Or perhaps one of the mentors would look this over.
 
DanielJackins said:
Would it be like this? I think I've got it.


http://i.imgur.com/TxF7bae.jpg
Yes, that's it. The box you have in the 2nd quadrant threw me off for a bit, but I see that this is not actually part of your graph.

Some fine points that your graph doesn't show:

The horizontal lines in the 1st quadrant get closer and closer together as the y values get closer to 0.
The points that you show in the 1st quadrant do the same thing.

Your graph shows (correctly) that the rectangular region in Q IV includes the left and bottom edges, but does not include the top and right edges.

Your graph also shows (correctly) that the vertical line segment in Q IV includes the lowest point, but not the highest one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K