Celestial mechanics with symplectic integrators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the algorithm in a paper on celestial mechanics using symplectic integrators. Key points of confusion include the meaning of the sum from 1 to n in equation 2, the interpretation of n, and the application of exponential operators in the equations. There is uncertainty about the general solution q(t) = exp(tau * F) * q(t-tau) and its relation to dq/dt = Fq. Additionally, the relevance of equation 7 to previous equations is unclear, and there is a need for clarification on the concept of degrees of freedom in this context. Overall, the participant seeks specific guidance to grasp these concepts before their presentation.
Masklin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is that I just don't understand how the algorithm described here in section 2 hangs together... I have to present this on Thursday morning and that sensation of 'I'll never understand this soon enough' is growing ominously.

Homework Equations



Equations 2,6,7 and 8 are a mystery to me. I could write them out here but they're already in the paper and without their context it wouldn't help much I think.

Why is there a sum from 1 to n in equation 2? What is n? It doesn't say...

And, how is q(t) = exp(tau * F) * q(t-tau) a general solution to dq/dt = Fq ?

Shouldn't it be q(t) = q(tau) * exp(Fq) ?

How does one knows in which order to apply the exponential operators in equation 6?

Where does equation 7 fit in with anything introduced previously?

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt at a solution is asking for help here... I've googled but my questions are far too specific for that to help. =(

Please please help!Masklin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equ. 2 is an application of the chain rule and then Equ. 1. n is the number of the degrees of freedom.
 
Degrees of freedom - what does that mean in this context? The dimensionality of x and p, or the number of bodies? Or something else?
 
The dimension of x.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top