Centripetal Acceleration check my reasoning

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab experiment involving centripetal acceleration, where a hanging mass is used to determine the mass of a rubber stopper. The participant is seeking clarification on when to treat the masses as a single system versus separately in their calculations. They express confusion over different equations yielding varying results and emphasize the importance of understanding this distinction to avoid losing points in future assessments. The conversation highlights the need for clear guidance on applying the net force concept in relation to combined masses in physics problems. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving similar problems in mechanics.
pointintime
Messages
165
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ok well then...

we did a lab were you have a hanging mass attached to a stirng that went through a straw and was attached to a rubber stopper. The lab was to find the mass of the rubber stopper once you know the velocity. So I was woundering if this looks correct

Homework Equations



f = ma
m1 = mass of stopper
m2 = mass of hanging mass

radial acceleration = r^-1 v^2

The Attempt at a Solution



net force radial = m (acceleration radial) = force of gravity on mass m2
net force radial = (m1 + m2) (acceleration radial) = m2 g
net force radial = m1(acceleration radial) + m2 (acceleration radial) = m2 g
net force radial = m1(acceleration radial) = m2 g - m2 (acceleration radial)

divided both sides by acceleration radial

m1 = (acceleration radial)^-1 ( m2 g - m2 (acceleration radial) )

at which point I plugged in the value I found for the radius
the value I found for the period
and found the radial acceleration
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok hmmm

m2 g = m1 (acceleration radial)

so then if this is the correct equation my question... is how do you know when to consider the masses as a system and when not to?

net force = mass times acceleration

by deffintion
it dosen\'t mean this necessarily

net force = net mass times acceleration

when do I know when I should use the net mass and when not to as I have gotten points taken off before because i didn\'t use the net mass and am not sure when to consider the masses as one system and when not to...

like how come this is wrong

net force radial = (m1 + m2) (acceleration radial) = force of gravity on m2

and this is right

net force radial = m1 (acceleration radial) = force of gravity on m2

I need help on when to make this distinction between the masses and when not to as I don\'t know when i should...

THANKS!
This has been eating me away and I need to know this or the whole problem is wrong so it\'s important that I know when to make this distinction and when not to. So can you tell me when I should and when I shouldn\'t?
 
M1g = Msv^2/r

M1 was your known mass hanging. g is the acceleration due to gravity. Ms is the mass of your rubber stopper. v is the speed of your rubber stopper and r was the length of the string from the straw to the rubber stopper (the radius of the circle the rubber stopper was making around the straw)

I guess you counted how many times it took to make a certain number of revolutions in a certain amount of time. 1 rev. =2 x pi x r. Divide the number of revolutions by the time in seconds it took to make those revolutions and you got v. At this point you know everything but Ms so put all the numbers in and solve for Ms
 
can you answer my question in #3
 
Could you please give me your data:

Mass of the object hanging from the string.
radius of the circle the stopper was making while holding the mass at rest below the straw.
How many times the stopper went around and in what amount of time.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top