Centripetal Acceleration Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating centripetal acceleration for a centrifuge rotating at 12000 rpm with a radius of 150 mm. The conversion from rpm to radians per second is correctly performed, resulting in 400π rads/sec. The tangential velocity is calculated as 188.5 m/s, leading to a centripetal acceleration of approximately 236881.6 m/s². Participants confirm the calculations are accurate and clarify that direct use of angular velocity in the centripetal acceleration formula is also valid. Overall, the exercise is deemed well-executed with no significant errors identified.
Kieran12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A centrifuge rotates at 12000rpm, what is the radians per second? If the radius of the centrifuge is 150mm, what is the centripetal acceleration?

Homework Equations



Angular Velocity: ω = Δθ/Δt (maybe, not sure)

Centripetal Acceleration: a = v2 / r

The Attempt at a Solution



To get the radians per second, I did 12000 x 2π = 24000π rads/min. Then to get this in rads/sec I just did 24000π / 60 = 400π rads/sec
This gives me the tangential velocity (I think).

Then for to get the centripetal acceleration, I firstly converted the 400π rads/sec to metres/sec: 400π x 0.150 = 60π = 188.5 m/s.

I then used the formula for Centripetal Acceleration to get: a = 188.52 / 0.150
Which gave me: a = 236881.6 m/s2
Any and all help is welcome! If I've done this completely wrong please feel free to destroy everything I thought true and correct me like a Physics martyr.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Kieran and welcome to PF. I am also a newbie and I wonder if PF is meant to help all to score A++ or whatever regional markings exist.

On the other hand, your posting is exemplary. Completely clear.

You have done the exercise, checked the results. Is there something you are uncomfortable with, or something you would like to have explained ?

The 'not sure' part: yes, radians per second is radians divided by seconds. Same as with meters per second for speed. Normally a differential, but for uniform rotation a ratio.

And, to cap: I can't find anything wrong in what you did. Does that help ?
 
Last edited:
Erm. I'd like someone to explain what I've done wrong, where I've gone wrong and what I need to do to make it un-wrong.
 
Looks good! Note that you don't have to convert to tangential speed you can directly use centripetal acc = w^2(r).
 
Last edited:
Hi Kieran12! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

All looks correct. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top