Certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decay rate of a certain isotope, which decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over 5 days. The user initially calculated the decay constant (lambda) and expressed confusion about it being negative, questioning the validity since half-life should be positive. It was clarified that if the initial activity (R0) is incorrectly assigned as the lesser value, it could lead to a negative lambda, indicating an increase rather than a decrease in activity. The importance of consistent unit conversion was emphasized to ensure accurate calculations. Ultimately, understanding the correct application of the decay equation is crucial for determining the half-life correctly.
xinlan
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Measurements of a certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over a period of 5.00 days.

Homework Equations



R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
then T1/2 = ln(2)/lamda

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the units..
t = 5 days = 432000 seconds
R = 8337 decays/minute = 52.9 decays/s
Ro=3174 decays/minute = 138.95 decays/s
I did:
R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
52.9=138.95 . e^-lamda*432000
lamda = -1.86*10^-6

I am confused.. the lamda should not be a negative number right?

because half-life should be a positive number..
please help me..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one take R0 to be the lesser activity and the later activity to be greater, then one will get a negative lamdba since the activity is increasing.

Usually R(t) < R0, i.e. R(t) is decreasing from R0.


If one takes the ln of the decay equation, one can make it linear.

Start with R0 = 8337 decays/minute, then R(t=5days) = 3174 decays/minute, but make sure units/time are on the same basis.
 
I should convert all the units right?

then if the lamda is negative, the half-life will be negative, and should I just plug in the minus sign as well on the computer?
 
I got it.. :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top