Charge Distribution on Metal Plate: How to Find Surface Charge Density?

AI Thread Summary
To find the surface charge density on an uncharged metal plate near a point charge, consider the plate's polarization in the electric field, which causes one side to become positively charged and the other negatively charged. The electric force between the plate and the point charge can be expressed as F = kqQ/r^2, where Q represents the induced charge on the plate. Since the plate is a conductor, the net charge remains zero, complicating the approximation of the plate as a single point charge. Instead, modeling the plate as a dipole allows for a better estimation of the induced charge on the surface closest to the point charge. Understanding this polarization effect is crucial for accurately determining the surface charge density.
kuokius
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Uncharged metal plate area S and thickness d located at a distance r from the point charge q and oriented perpendicular to the vector r, as shown below. Find the electric force between the plate and the charge.
The plate thickness is less, and the distance r is much greater than the linear dimensions of the plate.

http://s8.postimg.org/62esehalx/Untitled.png

Homework Equations



F = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}
E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
If considering a metal plate as a charge Q (because r is much greater than the linear dimensions of the plate) then the force between them would be:

F = \frac{kqQ}{r^2}

Q = \sigma S

And that's where I stop. I don't know how to find surface charge density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuokius said:
If considering a metal plate as a charge Q (because r is much greater than the linear dimensions of the plate) then the force between them would be:

F = \frac{kqQ}{r^2}

What is the value of Q for the plate?

Can you see why the plate is attracted to the point charge even thought the plate is uncharged?
 
TSny said:
What is the value of Q for the plate?

Can you see why the plate is attracted to the point charge even thought the plate is uncharged?
Because the plate is conductor and the conductor placed in electric field polarizes, i.e. one side of the plate electrifies positive and the other side negative. Also, the electric field inside a conductor is equal zero.
 
OK. But note that the net charge Q on the plate will always be zero. So, if you treat the plate as one point charge, Q, then ##F = \frac{kqQ}{r^2}## will give zero for the force. So, approximating the plate as one charge is too crude.

You have the right idea to model the plate as two opposite charges (a dipole). How are you going to estimate the charge induced on the surface of the plate that is nearest the point charge?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top