Checking Whether a Force is Conservative Using Integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter SHISHKABOB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying whether two given forces are conservative or nonconservative by performing line integrals along specified paths. For the conservative force, F = yhat{x} + xhat{y}, the integration along two different paths yields the same result, confirming its conservative nature. In contrast, the nonconservative force, F = xyhat{x} + xhat{y}, produces different results when integrated along the same paths, demonstrating that the work done is path-dependent. Participants express confusion about the concept of "taking a path" for integration and clarify the process of calculating line integrals. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of path choice in determining the conservativeness of a force.
SHISHKABOB
Messages
539
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Perform the integration, ∫\vec{F}\bullet d\vec{r}, of the following forces along two independent paths, to verify that (a) is conservative and (b) is nonconservative.

Start from the origin and end at the point (1,1). Take one path as the line x = y; for the other path, take the x-axis to the point (1,0), then the line x = 1 up to the point (1,1).

(a) Verify that \vec{F} = y\hat{x} + x\hat{y} is conservative by integration of two paths, as described above.

(b) do the same to \vec{F} = xy\hat{x} + x\hat{y} to show that it is nonconservative


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



okay so, I can see that this is a very simple problem, but I have a very simple issue: I don't think I know what it means to "take a path" for an integral.

What should happen is that for the conservative force, I should get the same result for both paths. This shows that the path does not affect the amount of work done.

For the nonconservative force, I should get two different results. This would show that the path choice affects how much work is done.



So my base assumption is that

\int \vec{F}\bullet d\vec{r} = \int F_{x}dx + \int F_{y}dy

so the first path is along x = y to (1,1)

\int F_{x}dx + \int F_{y}dy from 0 to 1 for both.

Then the second path is \int F_{x}dx + \int F_{y}dy from 0 to 1 for x and 0 to 0 for y

plus

\int F_{x}dx + \int F_{y}dy from 0 to 0 for x and 0 to 1 for y

so I get x + y in both cases, so far so good

I then do the same thing for \vec{F} = xy\hat{x} + x\hat{y}

but also get the same result for both paths. This leads me to believe that I don't have any idea what "integrating along a path" means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check a definition of a line integral
 
Calculate the definite integral along the blue line and also along the red one.

Along the blue line, x=y. Therefore dy=(dy/dx)=dx.
In case a), Fx=y, Fy=x, so Fx=x, Fy=x along the line.

\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,1)}{F_xdx+F_ydy}=\int_{0}^{1}{(x+x)dx}


In case b), Fx=xy=x2, Fy=x.
\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,1)}{F_xdx+F_ydy}=\int_{0}^{1}{(x^2+x)dx}

ehild


Following the red line, you integral from (0,0) to (1,0) first, then from (1,0) to (1,1)

\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,1)}{(F_xdx+F_ydy}=\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,0)}{F_xdx}+\int_{(1,0)}^{(1,1)}F_ydy

Along the horizontal line y=0. Along the vertical line x=1.

Case a): \int_{(0,0)}^{(1,1)}{F_xdx+F_ydy}=\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,0)}{ydx}+\int_{(1,0)}^{(1,1)}xdy=\int_{0}^{1}{0*dx}+\int_{0}^{1}1*dy

Case b):
\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,1)}{F_xdx+F_ydy}=\int_{(0,0)}^{(1,0)}{xydx}+\int_{(1,0)}^{(1,1)}xdy=\int_{0}^{1}{0*dx}+\int_{0}^{1}1*dy

Try to do the integral also along the green path.


ehild
 

Attachments

  • lineint.JPG
    lineint.JPG
    8.7 KB · Views: 418
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top