Choose Halliday & Resnick Physics Text | Advice & Reviews

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the best version of Halliday and Resnick's Physics for self-learning. Participants recommend opting for older editions, particularly the 3rd edition, which is noted for its thoroughness and inclusion of historical context that enriches the learning experience. The 3rd edition is praised for having many valuable problems that have been omitted in newer versions. Users express a preference for the non-glossy, straightforward presentation of older texts, as opposed to the modern glossy style. The separate volumes of the 3rd edition are also highlighted for their ease of handling while studying. Overall, the consensus leans towards the 3rd edition as the most beneficial choice for learners seeking depth and clarity in physics.
IgnacioMagana
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am looking for advice on which version of Halliday and Resnick Physics to get. I am currently wondering if it would be wise to go for an early version of the text. I ask this because I've been self learning calculus from Calculus and Analytic Geometry by Thomas (Alternate ed, basically 4th) but before that I tried working with an Stewart text and completely hated the style and the lack of proofs. So in your opinion, what version of Halliday and Resnick I should get, the older the better, I hate the glossy textbook style of nowdays.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I picked up copies of Volume 1 and Volume 2 of Physics by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane for $1 each. There are no glossy pictures (the entire text is in black, white, blue, and grey) and it's more thorough than the current Fundamentals of Physics by Resnick and Halliday. You'll notice its age in some of the problems and dates, but the content is still relevant.
 
I had the sixth edition of resnick,halliday and walker.It was good but I feel the 3rd edition was the best with many good questions now omitted and contained a bit of ''history" as well to create a background.
 
adiphysics said:
I had the sixth edition of resnick,halliday and walker.It was good but I feel the 3rd edition was the best with many good questions now omitted and contained a bit of ''history" as well to create a background.

The 3rd edition in two separate volumes may be more comfortable to hold while reading.

Here's Part 1:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471717169/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and Part 2:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471345296/?tag=pfamazon01-20

(The first pic is of an older edition. The 3rd ed. is green and yellow)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top