Circuit Analysis - Solving for unknown Voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for unknown voltage using nodal analysis in circuit analysis. A participant expresses confusion about forming a supernode and questions the assumptions made regarding current flow in the equations provided. They highlight inconsistencies in the equations, particularly regarding the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and the definition of nodes. After some back and forth, they successfully resolve their issues using Pspice, determining that V0 is approximately 22.345 V. The conversation underscores the challenges of terminology and methods in circuit analysis, emphasizing the importance of clarity in defining nodes and applying KCL.
salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
1.Check Image

3. Perhaps there are other ways to solve the problem but if I use nodal analysis, I am confused on how a SUPERNODE will be formed.

my equations:(Vo-30)/1 = (Vo-v1)/4 + (Vo)/2

V2/16=3

-v1 +2vo+v2=0
--------------------------------------------------
v2 = 3*16=48

2Vo-v1=-48

v1= 2Vo+48Vo-30 (-Vo/2)= (Vo-(2Vo+48))/4

2Vo -120= Vo -2Vo-48

2Vo+2Vo-Vo=120-48Vo= 24 V


Is that right?
 

Attachments

  • k.jpg
    k.jpg
    11.2 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
for your first KCL (Kirchoff's Current Law) equation, I don't quite understand the first term on the right-hand side. Which node have you defined to be node 1, with voltage v1?.

Also, why is V2/16 = 3 A? Doesn't that assume that ALL of the current from the current source flows into the branch with the 16 ohm resistor, and none of it flows through the voltage-controlled voltage source? Why are you making that assumption?

I have no idea what a super node is. There are so many naming conventions and techniques out there, that it's really hard to keep them straight. One of my profs even told us that the method he was teaching us was not taught by anyone else and differed from what was in the textbook. So you'll be likely to meet confusion here if you use terminology specific to your class. What I do is just define nodes and then use KCL to set up a system of linear equations that will help me to solve for the unknown(s). If that is called nodal analysis or modified nodal analysis, then so be it. I have no idea what the difference is.

Since you've clearly done a fair bit of work on it, I'll take a crack at it and post my solution in a second.
 
nevermind i got it. I used Pspice and got V0 is 22.345 V

and there were some errors in my equations, i figured it THANKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top