Circuit Homework: Find R for Switch Closed/Not Closed

  • Thread starter Thread starter ianb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent resistance (R) for a circuit with a switch in two states: closed and open. When the switch is not closed, the equivalent resistance is derived as R + 50, while with the switch closed, it is calculated as R + 18. The user finds a discrepancy between their calculated value of R (14) and the book's answer (24). Participants suggest verifying the calculations and question the reliability of the book's answers. The configuration of the resistors when the switch is closed is clarified as being in series after the parallel connections are established.
ianb
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/1223/questionju1.jpg

Homework Equations



Parallell: \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_{1}} + \frac{1}{R_{2}}

Series: R_{eq} = R_{1} + R_{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Part 1 - When the switch is not closed:

R_{eq_2} = R + ((90+10)^{-1} + (90+10)^{-1})^{-1}
R_{eq_1} = R + 50

Part 2 - When the switch is closed:

R_{eq_2} = R + (90^{-1} + 10^{-1})^{-1} + (90^{-1} + 10^{-1})^{-1}
R_{eq_2} = R + 18

Since R_{eq_1} = 2R_{eq_2}, then

R + 50 = 2(R + 18)
R + 50 = 2R + 36
R = 14

The answer in the back, though, is 24. What have I done wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question, it looks to me like you did it right. Are you sure you didn't make a numerical error (this part looks okay too, though I didn't actually calculate)? How trustworthy are the answers in your book?
 
Thanks, mindscrape. I suppose the book could have misprinted the answer. One more thing, though, if you don't mind:

When the switch is closed, I calculated two parallel circuits. Are these two circuits, in turn, parallel to each other, or in series to each other (like I did above)?
 
Last edited:
When the switch closes, it creates a node between the four resistors. The resulting parallel connections will be in series with each other - the way you calculated it. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top