Circuit with capacitors in series and parallel

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the equivalent capacitance of a circuit with capacitors arranged in both series and parallel configurations, using a 20.0V battery and specific capacitance values for each capacitor.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the arrangement of capacitors, with attempts to combine them based on series and parallel rules. Questions arise about the correctness of the connections and whether all parallel connections have been identified.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and guidance on how to visualize the circuit better, suggesting redrawing the diagram to clarify connections. There is acknowledgment of progress in understanding the configuration, but no explicit consensus on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion due to the layout of the circuit diagram and emphasize the importance of identifying equipotential points for accurate analysis.

leslielau
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem taken from : Fundamentals of Physics , Volume 2 ( 7th edition) Halliday , Resnick , Walker

In the figure, a 20.0V battery is connected across capacitors with capacitances C1=C6=3.00mF and
C3=C5=2.00C2=2.00C4=4.00mF

What is the equivalent capacitance Ceq of the capacitors?


Homework Equations



Capacitors in series:
Q = Q1 = Q2 = ...
V = v1 + v2 + ...
1/Ceq = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + ...

Capacitors in parallel:
Q = Q1 + Q2 + ...
V = V1 = V2 = ...
Ceq = C1 + C2 + ...

The Attempt at a Solution



Given data : C1=C6=3.00mF
C3=C5=4.00mF
C2=C4=2.00mF

I tried combining C3 and C5 since they were connected in series:

So 1/C35= 1/4+1/4= C35=2mF

Then I tried combining C35 and C4 as they were connected in parallel :
C345 = 2+2=4mF

Then I'm stuck on how to solve the network of C345,C1,C6 and C2.

Did I do any of the above steps wrong and can anyone give me some hints on how to continue ?? Thanks !


PS: I am sorry that the image in the pdf file may be quite small. Please magnify it to see the numbers .Thanks again !
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing great. I really don't know the rules as to only help you, or give the complete solution, so I'll just go for the hint first:
You say C35 and C4 are connected parallel. That's true. But are there any other ones that are connected parallel?

What I usually do in problems with circuits that are hard to see is to start drawing the hole thing again. Start from the battery, and draw the circuit again, making sure to connect points that are equipotetial(sorry i don't know the english word for that), and have them meet in one and only one point.
I basically got (counting C35 as one capacitor) a series of two packs of capacitors, one pack having 3 connected parallel, the other only 2. That's what you should get as well.
 
Welcome to PF!

You are probably letting the layout of the drawing confuse you. Try redraw the diagram such that common wires between three elements or more are replaced by a node (draw a dot on the diagram) and then a wire from the node to each element. For instance, the negative of the battery (the top wire) is connected to C4, C5 and C2, so replace that wire by with a node(say, draw a dot over C4) and the connect the node to the anode, C4, C5 and C2.

Once you have done so for the whole diagram it should be easier to spot which element is in parallel and which is in series. If you can trace a path from one node to another without meeting any other nodes on the way, the elements you passed on the path is in series which you can reduce to one equivalent element. If you from one node to another have multiple paths (each only one element) those elements are in parallel and you can replace the paths with a single path with the equivalent element.
 
I tried redrawing and saw that C35, C4 and C2 are connected parallel ; C6 and C1 are connected parallel .

Then I combined them and C2345= 6mF C16= 6mF

So the answer is 1/Ceq=1/6+1/6

Ceq=3mF?
 
Looks good.
 
Thanks for all the help !
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
970
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
3K