Circuit with capacitors in series and parallel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent capacitance (Ceq) of a circuit with capacitors connected in series and parallel. The user initially combines capacitors C3 and C5 in series, resulting in a capacitance of 2mF, and then combines this with C4 in parallel to get 4mF. Further guidance suggests redrawing the circuit to better visualize connections, leading to the realization that C35, C4, and C2 are in parallel, while C1 and C6 are also in parallel. Ultimately, the equivalent capacitance is calculated as 3mF after combining the identified groups correctly.
leslielau
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem taken from : Fundamentals of Physics , Volume 2 ( 7th edition) Halliday , Resnick , Walker

In the figure, a 20.0V battery is connected across capacitors with capacitances C1=C6=3.00mF and
C3=C5=2.00C2=2.00C4=4.00mF

What is the equivalent capacitance Ceq of the capacitors?


Homework Equations



Capacitors in series:
Q = Q1 = Q2 = ...
V = v1 + v2 + ...
1/Ceq = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + ...

Capacitors in parallel:
Q = Q1 + Q2 + ...
V = V1 = V2 = ...
Ceq = C1 + C2 + ...

The Attempt at a Solution



Given data : C1=C6=3.00mF
C3=C5=4.00mF
C2=C4=2.00mF

I tried combining C3 and C5 since they were connected in series:

So 1/C35= 1/4+1/4= C35=2mF

Then I tried combining C35 and C4 as they were connected in parallel :
C345 = 2+2=4mF

Then I'm stuck on how to solve the network of C345,C1,C6 and C2.

Did I do any of the above steps wrong and can anyone give me some hints on how to continue ?? Thanks !


PS: I am sorry that the image in the pdf file may be quite small. Please magnify it to see the numbers .Thanks again !
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing great. I really don't know the rules as to only help you, or give the complete solution, so I'll just go for the hint first:
You say C35 and C4 are connected parallel. That's true. But are there any other ones that are connected parallel?

What I usually do in problems with circuits that are hard to see is to start drawing the hole thing again. Start from the battery, and draw the circuit again, making sure to connect points that are equipotetial(sorry i don't know the english word for that), and have them meet in one and only one point.
I basically got (counting C35 as one capacitor) a series of two packs of capacitors, one pack having 3 connected parallel, the other only 2. That's what you should get as well.
 
Welcome to PF!

You are probably letting the layout of the drawing confuse you. Try redraw the diagram such that common wires between three elements or more are replaced by a node (draw a dot on the diagram) and then a wire from the node to each element. For instance, the negative of the battery (the top wire) is connected to C4, C5 and C2, so replace that wire by with a node(say, draw a dot over C4) and the connect the node to the anode, C4, C5 and C2.

Once you have done so for the whole diagram it should be easier to spot which element is in parallel and which is in series. If you can trace a path from one node to another without meeting any other nodes on the way, the elements you passed on the path is in series which you can reduce to one equivalent element. If you from one node to another have multiple paths (each only one element) those elements are in parallel and you can replace the paths with a single path with the equivalent element.
 
I tried redrawing and saw that C35, C4 and C2 are connected parallel ; C6 and C1 are connected parallel .

Then I combined them and C2345= 6mF C16= 6mF

So the answer is 1/Ceq=1/6+1/6

Ceq=3mF?
 
Looks good.
 
Thanks for all the help !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top