Circuit with Inductor: Current, Battery, Resistor

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakko101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Inductors
wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
The problem is: There is a circuit such that a battery (source of constant emf) is connected to an inductor and a resister (in series). After an unspecified time period, a switch is thrown, effectively bypassing the battery.

I know (becuase I've seen the answer) that a) the initial current is the battery's emf divided by R and b) that once the switch has been thrown, in order to find the current, one would set the emf of the inductor equal to IR (then solved the differential equation). I just want to clarify as to why this is so.

The initial current: the inductor is acting as "back emf" so it's pushing against the current created by the battery. The battery has to do more work in order to maintain the same emf as it would were the inductor not there, however, it doesn't affect that fact that the current is (eventually) equal to the initial emf divided by the resistance. Is that right?

After the switch: the inductor is providing the only emf in the circuit, and it is effectively slowing it down. The potential difference across the resistor will then be equal to the only emf present in the circuit (ie. the inductor).

Does that sound about right?

Another question: why is the current in a circuit consisting of a capacitor at an initial V and an inductor oscillatory? Does that mean it never diminishes, but simply constantly changes direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inductor capacitor circuit, commonly called a 'tank circuit' is oscillatory because the inductor charges the capacitor then the capacitor discharges and the current flows back to the inductor then the inductor charges the capacitor again until the current finally decays.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top