Clarification about Mutual Inductance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of mutual inductance and the effect of coil orientation on magnetic flux. When coil 2 is rotated to a 90-degree position relative to coil 1, it experiences almost zero magnetic flux due to the perpendicular alignment, which is generally treated as zero for practical calculations. The participants clarify that the area of coil 2 should be considered as a complete circular coil, despite initial confusion over its depiction as an open loop. The mathematical relationship for calculating flux through the area is emphasized, particularly the importance of the angle between the magnetic field and the coil's area. Overall, the conversation seeks to clarify the implications of coil orientation on mutual inductance and magnetic flux calculations.
Physicslearner500039
Messages
124
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
In if coil 2 is turned so that its axis is vertical, does the mutual inductance increase or decrease? Explain.
Relevant Equations
emf = ##\frac {-N_{2} {d\phi}_{B2}} {dt}## ## M_{21} = \frac {{N_2}{\phi}_{B2}} {i_1}##
emf = ##\frac {-N_{2} {d\phi}_{B2}} {dt}## ## M_{21} = \frac {{N_2}{\phi}_{B2}} {i_1}## are the equations
1599881309992.png

This is the original position, now the coil 2 is moved so the axis is perpendicular. The flux ##{\phi}_{B2}## due to i1 is the amount of flux cutting the coil 2 due to change in current i1. My answer is 0, since no flux cuts the Coil 2 in 90 degrees position. Is it correct? My main confusion is with respect to the area of the coil. How to consider it? i do not see the coil 2 as closed circuit it is open loop. So, what will be the area. Please advise.

Note: One another problem is i cannot preview the Homework statement and the Relevant Equations section. I have a workaround for the equations section, but still not sure if latex symbols work for the Homework statement. Please advise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicslearner500039 said:
My answer is 0, since no flux cuts the Coil 2 in 90 degrees position. Is it correct?
Hi. You are correct. There is (almost) zero flux through rotated coil-2. I say 'almost' because the coil has finite thickness and is spiral-wound which means a *very* small amount of flux cuts the coil - we can usually treat it as zero.
My main confusion is with respect to the area of the coil. How to consider it? i do not see the coil 2 as closed circuit it is open loop. So, what will be the area.
I'm not sure I understand the question. But see if this helps.

Visualise the flux and area as you have done here. You can then 'see' if flux passes through the coil, rather than being parallel to the coil's plane.

Mathematically, you multiply the *component* of flux perpendicular to the area (i.e. parallel to the area's normal) by the area.

For example, for area A with its normal at angle θ to uniform field B, the flux through the area is Φ = ABcosθ (which is zero if θ = 90º).
not sure if latex symbols work for the Homework statement.
Sorry, can't help with that.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
1599913421775.png
When rotated 90 Degrees
1599914127235.png

Is my understanding correct? Please advise.
 
Physicslearner500039 said:
My main confusion is with respect to the area of the coil. How to consider it? i do not see the coil 2 as closed circuit it is open loop. So, what will be the area.
I'm not sure, but I'm wondering if the figure is misleading you. The figure does not show the entire coils. The figure is a "cutaway" figure. The coils are complete circular coils.
 
I agree with TSNy (#4). The coils are meant to be omplete circular ones (or they cannot be called 'coils'!). The diagram is simply a cut-away schematic.

If they were actual open half-coils as shown, there could be no current through either and the question wouldn't make sense.
 
I interpret this as 2 neighboring coils with axes parallel, then one is rotated 90 deg. so that now the axes are mutually perpendicular.

In which case, what is mutual inductance in terms of the two coils' fluxes?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top