Clarification on angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of angular momentum in two scenarios involving central forces. In the first case, a particle's angular momentum about a fixed origin remains constant due to the nature of central forces, which exert no torque. In the second scenario, while the planet's distance from the sun (r) and angular velocity (ω) vary, their product, r²ω, results in a constant angular momentum. This illustrates that even though individual components may change, their relationship maintains a consistent angular momentum. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping fundamental physics concepts.
tryingtolearn1
Messages
58
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Conceptual clarification between two questions
Relevant Equations
Angular momentum
I am confused with the following two questions:

1. A particle moves under the influence of a central force directed toward a fixed origin ##O##. Explain why the particle's angular momentum about ##O## is constant.

2. Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the ##xy## plane, with the sun at the origin, and label the planet's position by polar coordinates ##(r,\phi)##. Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##l = mr^2\omega## , where ##\omega =\dot{\phi} ## is the planet's angular velocity about the sun.

These two questions both have a particle that moves under the influence of a central force but conceptually why is the first question a constant but the second question is not a constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tryingtolearn1 said:
Homework Statement:: Conceptual clarification between two questions
Relevant Equations:: Angular momentum

I am confused with the following two questions:

1. A particle moves under the influence of a central force directed toward a fixed origin ##O##. Explain why the particle's angular momentum about ##O## is constant.

2. Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the ##xy## plane, with the sun at the origin, and label the planet's position by polar coordinates ##(r,\phi)##. Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##l = mr^2\omega## , where ##\omega =\dot{\phi} ## is the planet's angular velocity about the sun.

These two questions both have a particle that moves under the influence of a central force but conceptually why is the first question a constant but the second question is not a constant?
The second equation involves the constant angular momentum ##l##. This tells you that, although ##r## and ##\dot \phi## separately are not constant, their product ##r^2 \dot \phi## must be constant.

The argument expressed in points 1 and 2 is fundamental to physics.
 
  • Like
Likes tryingtolearn1 and DrClaude
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top