Classical mechanics energy and momentum

Order
Messages
96
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I try to solve the problem 3.5 in Kleppner Kolenkow ”An introduction to Mechanics” using various approaches but end up with wrong answers. The problem is:
3.5 A circus acrobat of mass M leaps straight up with initial velocity v0 from a trampoline. As he rises up he takes a trained monkey of mass m off a perch at a height h above the trampoline. What is the maximum height attained by the pair.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



At first I use the fact that the center of mass is at hm/(M+m). The velocity of the center of mass is v1 = Mv0/(M+m).
Since they reach a maximum height v2/2g + x0 the height attained is
xmax = v12/2g + hm/(M+m) = M2*v02/(M+m)2/2g + hm/(M+m)
The first term is right here. The second is not.

Secondly i use energy conservation:
Wbefore = mgh + Mv02/2
Wafter = (M+m)gxmax

This gives:
xmax = hm/(M+m)+Mv02/2(M+m)g

The right answer is v02M2/(M+m)2/2g+h(1- M2/(M+m)2)
I know how to get to the right answer, but what I need is an explanation of what laws of physics i don't obey.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the 2nd approach, it's obvious: mechanical energy is not conserved. When the man picks up the monkey, that's a "collision."

It's more subtle in the 1st approach. Hint: What's the assumption for the equation: x - xo = v2/2g? Further hint: the original one is actually
x - xo = v2/2a with the assumption that a = const.
 
Thanks Hikaru!

I think I see. Below h you can show that dv/dt = -gM/(M+m), Whereas above h the acceleration is simply g. I think I will leave the center of mass approach. It is too complicated!

Instead I can divide it into three steps where in the first step the mass is M and in the last step the mass is M+m Then I can use the equations for constant acceleration.

In the energy case I can divide the problem into three steps where mechanical energy is conserved in the first and last step. In the second step I use momentum conservation of course.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top