Clausius-Mossotti Equation and Dielectric Constants of Air

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blastrix91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clausius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Clausius-Mossotti equation to calculate the polarizability of air, using provided values for molar mass, density, and dielectric constant. The user attempts to derive the polarizability, α, but finds a discrepancy between their calculated value and the one in the textbook. Feedback highlights an error in the molar mass of air and suggests a misapplication of the Clausius-Mossotti equation, particularly regarding the denominator. Additionally, clarification is sought on whether the calculated polarizability pertains to a molecule or an atom. The conversation concludes with the user acknowledging the corrections and expressing gratitude for the assistance.
Blastrix91
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/5676/unavngivetk.png

Additional table info:

The molarmass ##M_{air}## is ##29 * 10^{-3} g/mol = 29*\frac{10^{-3}}{1000} kg/mol##
The mass density ## \rho_{air} ## is ##1.3 kg/m^{3}##
The dielectric constant ## K_{air}## is 1.00059

My teacher told me to consider the air as 1 molecule.

Homework Equations



http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/1667/unavngivet2w.png

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is my approach:

Basically it is only N we need which is molecules per volume:

N = \frac{Molecules}{V} = \frac{N_a n}{V} = \frac{m}{M_{air}} \frac{N_a}{V} = \frac{\rho_{air}V}{M_{air}} \frac{N_a}{V} = \frac{\rho_{air}N_a}{M_{air}}

\alpha = \frac{3 \varepsilon_0 M_{air}}{\rho_{air}N_a} \frac{K_{air}-1}{K_{air}+1}

Inserting the values:\frac{3(8.854*10^{-12})(29*\frac{10^{-3}}{1000})}{1.3(6.022*10^{23})} * \frac{1.00059 - 1}{1.00059 + 1} = 2.902 * 10^{-43}

The answer in the back of my book says it is supposed to be: ##\alpha = 9.7 * 10^{-41}##

Can any of you guys spot where I did wrong? (The table values were some I got from my teacher and if my approach is right, then he might have wrote them wrong)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Blastrix91 said:
The molarmass ##M_{air}## is ##29 * 10^{-3} g/mol = 29*\frac{10^{-3}}{1000} kg/mol##

A quick Google check on the molar mass of air will show an error in this value.

You used
\alpha = \frac{3 \varepsilon_0 M_{air}}{\rho_{air}N_a} \frac{K_{air}-1}{K_{air}+1}

but the denominator of ##K_{air}+1 ## does not agree with the form of the Claussius-Mossotti equation that you quoted.Also, does your answer for ##\alpha## correspond to a molecule or an atom?
 
Last edited:
All three things you pointed out gave me the right answer. Thank you ^^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top