- #1
ThomasT
- 529
- 0
In a recent thread about differential aging in the archetypal twin scenario, I suggested that the periods of oscillators are affected by accelerations, or in other words that a clock's tick rate is affected by changes in its speed.
This statement was disagreed with by some, who said that it was contradicted by the clock hypothesis or postulate.
However, the clock postulate just says that the rate of the earthbound clock is always related to the rate of the traveling clock by (1-v2)-1/2 .
From the above mentioned thread, when asked for an equation relating tick rate and acceleration, I replied:
To which DaleSpam replied:
Note that v is speed.
Are we in agreement then? Has it been straightened out?
This statement was disagreed with by some, who said that it was contradicted by the clock hypothesis or postulate.
However, the clock postulate just says that the rate of the earthbound clock is always related to the rate of the traveling clock by (1-v2)-1/2 .
From the above mentioned thread, when asked for an equation relating tick rate and acceleration, I replied:
ThomasT said:What about this:
The tick rate is r(1-(v/c)2)0.5, where v is the relative velocity of the clock and the observer determining a tick rate, and r is the tick rate of the clock at rest.
When the velocity of the traveling clock changes (when it's accelerated), then its tick rate (wrt the stationary earthbound observer) changes.
To which DaleSpam replied:
DaleSpam said:That is the same as the equation I gave, [tex] \frac {d\tau} {dt} = \sqrt {1-v^2/c^2} [/tex] . So if that is what you mean, then we are obviously in agreement. I am glad we straightened that out.
Note that v is speed.
Are we in agreement then? Has it been straightened out?