Clockwise rotation of the reflection coefficient w/ frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of the input reflection coefficient, ρ, of a linear time-invariant (LTI) causal passive system, which is noted to exhibit a local clockwise rotation with frequency when plotted on a Smith chart. This clockwise rotation is distinct from the negative derivative of phase with frequency, particularly in lossless systems, where it aligns with Foster’s reactance theorem. However, the lack of rigorous proof for lossy systems is highlighted, as existing literature primarily addresses the lossless case. The mathematical formulation provided indicates that the curvature of the reflection coefficient curve is negative, confirming the clockwise rotation. The thread concludes with a request for references or theorems that could support these observations, particularly in relation to energy considerations or the Kramers-Kronig relations.
WhiteHaired
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
It is always considered that the evolution of the input reflection coefficient, ρ, of a LTI causal passive system with frequency, f, always presents a local clockwise rotation when plotted in cartesian axes (Re(ρ), Im(ρ)), e.g. in a Smith chart, as shown in the attached figure.

It must appointed that the local clockwise rotation should not be confused with the derivative of the phase with frequency, which is always negative when the curve encompasses the center of the Smith chart, but it may be positive otherwise (e.g. in a resonant series RLC circuit with R>Z0, where Z0 is the port characteristic impedance). The question here concerns the local rotation, which is always clockwise.

For lossless systems, it may be explained from the Foster’s reactance theorem, “The imaginary immittance of a passive, lossless one-port monotonically increases with frequency”, which has been demonstrated in different ways in literature. It also applies for the reflection coefficient, since the bilinear transform (from immitance to reflection coefficient) preserves orientation.

However I couldn’t find any rigorous proof for lossy systems. Books and manuscripts always reference the lossless case and the Foster’s theorem.

Do you know any reference?

In geometry, for a plane curve given parametrically in Cartesian coordinates as (x(f),y(f)), the signed curvature, k, is

k=\frac{x'y''-y'x''}{(x^{2}+y^{2})^{3/2}}

where primes refer to derivatives with respect to frequency f. A negative value means that the curve is clockwise. Therefore, the reflection coefficient of a LTI causal passive system with frequency, f, has always a negative curvature when plotted in Cartesian coordinates (Re(ρ), Im(ρ)), i.e., it satisfies:

\frac{∂Re(ρ)}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}Im(ρ)}{∂f^{2}}<\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}Re(ρ)}{∂f^{2}}

or, equivalently,

\frac{∂}{∂f}\left[\frac{\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂f}}{\frac{∂Re(ρ)}{∂f}}\right]<0→\frac{∂}{∂f}\left(\frac{∂Im(ρ)}{∂Re(ρ)}\right)<0

The same would apply to the complex impedance Z=R+j*X, (or admittance), i.e., \frac{∂R}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}X}{∂f^{2}}<\frac{∂X}{∂f}\frac{∂^{2}R}{∂f^{2}} and \frac{∂}{∂f}\left(\frac{∂X}{∂R}\right)<0

Is all this right?

Do you know any theorem, property of LTI causal passive systems, energy considerations from which one may conclude this? Kramer-Kronig relations or Hilbert transform?

I would appreciate your help on this.
View attachment 77655
 
Thank you, not for the moment.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top