Coefficient of static friction of uniform rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum coefficient of static friction for a uniform rod in static equilibrium, with one end against a rough wall and the other connected to a fixed point. The equations provided indicate that the tension in the cord and the normal force must balance the weight of the rod and any additional weight applied. The initial attempt at solving the problem led to an incorrect equation due to a sign error in the torque calculation. Correcting this error is crucial for finding the accurate minimum coefficient of static friction, which is expressed in terms of the rod's length, the distance from the pivot, and the angle with the cord. The final answers for the coefficient of static friction are μ≥tanθ and μ≥(2l-d)tanθ/(l+d).
maurice2705
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform rod AB has a length l and a weight W0. End A is in contact with a rough wall, but it is not fixed. A massless cord connects end B and is fixed to the wall at point C. The rod AB is now horizontal and the angle formed between the cord and rod is θ as shown in the figure. (a) In order to achieve static equilibrium, what is the minimum value of the coefficient of static friction between the rod and the wall? (b) If a block of weight W=W0/2 is hang on the rod with the hanging point a distance d from the end point A, what is then the minimum value of the coefficient of static friction between the rod and the wall? Express all your results in terms of l, d, W0, and θ. (ANS: μ≥tanθ ; μ≥(2l-d)tanθ/(l+d) )


Homework Equations


Which point should we regard as the pivot?


The Attempt at a Solution


Set A as the pivot, then
Tsinθ+μN=W0
Tcosθ=N
Tsinθ*l+W0*l/2=0
Then I get μ=-3tanθ. What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maurice2705 said:
... Tsinθ*l+W0*l/2=0
...What's wrong?

All correct except the + in the torque equation.
Try replacing the + by -.
 
Thank you! I'd try again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top