hideelo
- 88
- 15
Although, I believe the PC term is temporaly challeneged
Source: http://web.mst.edu/~gbert/tombstone.htmlPage said:Tombstones for Scientists
(originated by John Hubisz, North Carolina State)
Here lies Isaac Newton - A body at rest tends to stay at rest.
Here lies Euclid - or at least his elements.
Here lies Heisenberg - maybe. If we indeed know precisely where
he was, we would not know where he is going.
Here lies Fermat - There isn't room enough for a proper epitaph.
Here lies Clausius - maximizing his entropy.
Here lies Albert Einstein - but his rest mass keeps decreasing.
Here lies Erwin Schrodinger - but without opening the casket, we can't be
sure he's dead.
Here lies J. Willard Gibbs - undergoing a phase change.
Here lies Amedeo Avogadro - damn those moles!
Here lies Antoine Lavoisier - he should have stuck to Chemistry,
but lost his head over taxes.
Here lies Pierre Curie - don't worry, it's a reflected glow.
Here lies Niels Bohr - now in the ground state.
Here lies Irving Langmuir - no longer a Surface Chemist.
John Hubisz has provided a few more that others have sent to him:
Here lies Alessandro Volta - well grounded at last. Prue Schran
Here lies Hans Bethe - He is now undergoing Be-tay decay. Jim Kernohan
Here the body of Ettore Majorana does not lie - his mass is
missing. Gerald Zani
Here lies Pauli - Room for one more. Paul Nord
Here lies Pauli - Spinning in his grave. Andy Gavrin
Here lies Pauli - he can only be in one grave at a time. Aaron Titus
Psinter said:Remember to eat your veggies and get some sun. So you can photosynthesis and grow strong.
BillTre said:
YOU GET [...] a year's supply of Preparation A for your atomic piles
DennisN said:![]()
DennisN said:![]()
http://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ad91d0dfe2be80b04f94f027b1f10e28?convert_to_webp=true
Oh the apropos-ity.Rebeca said:Lol, I like that one
apropos-ity / aproposityDaveC426913 said:Oh the apropos-ity.
I interpreted the curve as the difficulty of learning the software as a function of time.DaveC426913 said:Ah, I figured it out.
I was assuming the X-axis was time. It's not.
It's more like productivity.
Now, if you look at vi, you can see that productivity remains near zero no matter how much knowledge you acquire about it, until you acquire 100%.
But if time is the X-axis, that means the difficulty of learning starts OhhhIseeitnowHercuflea said:I interpreted the curve as the difficulty of learning the software as a function of time.
Wait - there's really such a word?davenn said:apropos-ity / aproposity
DaveC426913 said:Wait - there's really such a word?
Huh!
Yeah, I just needed the active voice instead of the passive voice.davenn said:apropos
http://www.bing.com/search?q=apropos+definition&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IENTSR&pc=EUPP_
note the adjective use ... :)
DennisN said:Ok, the last one for today...
![]()