Collision of electrons, kinetic energy?

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


What is the minimum amount of kinetic energy of electron that hits another electron, so ectra electron-positron pair is produced.


Homework Equations


##p^{\mu }=(E/c,\vec{p})##


The Attempt at a Solution



Before the collision:

##p^{\mu }=(\frac{E_e+m_ec^2}{c},p)##

and after: (not sure but... i guess?)

##p^{\mu }=(\frac{E_1+E_2+2m_ec^2}{c},p_1cos\varphi +p_2cos\theta ,p_1sin\varphi+p_2sin\theta )##

For index 1 the first electron, index 2 the second one which had no kinetic energy before the collision and pair electron-positron with no kinetic energy...

Is that right? Probably not, because I can't find a way to answer the question: minimum amount of kinetic energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First you'll have to find out how that collision will look like. What is the configuration of minimal energy? Hint: consider the center of mass frame.
With that knowledge, your equations simplify a lot.
 
mfb said:
First you'll have to find out how that collision will look like. What is the configuration of minimal energy? Hint: consider the center of mass frame.
With that knowledge, your equations simplify a lot.

Well that is my biggest problem: going in center of mass frame!

Let's try.. The way I understand it, what will happen is: ##e^{-}+e^{-}\rightarrow e^{-}+e^{-}+(e^{-}+e^{+})##

Before the collision in the center of mass frame:

##p^{*\mu }=(\frac{E_1+E_2}{c},p_{1}^{*}+p_{2}^{*})## where index 1 indicates electron that has some kinetic energy in the first frame and index 2 for electron that has no kinetic energy in first frame.

so ##p_{1}^{*}=-p_{2}^{*}##

After the collision in the center of mass frame: Let's put " ' " on everything after the collision

##p_{x1}^{'}=p_3^{'}cos\varphi ^{'}##

##p_{y1}^{'}=p_3^{'}sin\varphi ^{'}##

##p_{x2}^{'}=-p_4^{'}cos\varphi ^{'}##

##p_{y2}^{'}=-p_3^{'}sin\varphi ^{'}##

Ok, now to be completely honest with you... I simply copied the last 4 equations from my notes... I have got absolutely no idea what do they mean, why would they be useful or why do I need them and I haven't got a clue on how to continue from here.

Notes continue:

##p_3^{'}=mc\gamma ^*=mc\sqrt{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}## therefore

##p_{x1}^{'}=p_3^{'}cos\varphi ^{'}=mc\gamma ^*=mc\sqrt{\frac{\gamma -1}{2}}cos\varphi ^{'}## and

##p_{x1}^{'}=-p_3^{'}cos\varphi ^{'}=mc\gamma ^*=-mc\sqrt{\frac{\gamma -1}{2}}cos\varphi ^{'}##

Using Lorentz transformation back the primary frame:

##p_{x1}=\frac{mc}{2}\sqrt{\gamma ^2-1}(1+cos\varphi ^{'})##

##p_{x2}=\frac{mc}{2}\sqrt{\gamma ^2-1}(1-cos\varphi ^{'})##

If I understand correctly, these two are now moments after the collision in the first frame.

And that is where everything stops.. It' would probably be the easiest if somebody knows a website where these things are well explained?
 
Stop. You are doing this way too complicated.

What happens in the center of mass system when the energy is just enough to let the process happen? What can you know about the kinetic energies of the particles then?
Do not calculate anything. This is not necessary at this step.
 
If the energy is just enough to let the process happen, than after the process they wouldn't have any kinetic energy.
 
Right.

In the lab frame momentum conservation does not allow that, but what about their relative motion in the lab frame? In particular, do you need all those angles and different momenta?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top