Commutative free particle time evolution

chaotic
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/2532/70224197.png

Homework Equations



i know schrödingher eq. and basic quantum formula

The Attempt at a Solution



i showed that the equality at the first question but i can not start from (a) part. how and where am i supposed to start for (a) part of question?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i even don't know what is the time evoluation of varience? what is that?
 
Forget quantum mechanics for a second. From basic statistics, if x is a random variable, its variance is ##\sigma^2 = E[(x-\bar{x})^2]##, where ##\bar{x}=E(x)##. Now how does this translate into quantum mechanics? It should be clear how the first part of the problem then applies to solving (a).
 
thank you for your answer. now i am trying that

\frac{dψ}{dt} = \frac{iħ}{2m} d2ψ/dx2

after that i find that; (i send dt to right side)

ψ = ∫ \frac{iħ}{2m} d2ψ/dx2 dt

but i don't know how can i take the integral of right side?

after that i will use the <x> = ∫ψ* x ψ

is that true?
 
I have no idea what you're doing.
 
me too. I am very confused. can you just tell me how can i find <x(t)> and <x(t)^2>
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top