JamesF
- 13
- 0
Hi everyone. I feel like I'm really close to the answer on this one, but just out of reach :) I hope someone can give me some pointers
Let A1 \supseteq A2 \supseteq A3 \supseteq \ldots be a sequence of compact, nonempty subsets of a metric space (X, d). Show that \bigcap A_n \neq \emptyset. (Hint: Let U_n = X-A_n)
I tried showing by contradiction.
Suppose \bigcap A_n = \emptyset
Choose an open subcover U_n = X-A_n (that's supposed to be set minus but I don't know how to do \ in tex). Then \bigcup U_n = (X-A_1) \cup (X - A_2) \ldots = X - (\bigcap A_n) = X
but where's the contradiction? So X is not compact, but that goes without saying and we can't infer much from that. What am I overlooking here? Or is this the wrong approach entirely?
Thank you for your assistance.
Homework Statement
Let A1 \supseteq A2 \supseteq A3 \supseteq \ldots be a sequence of compact, nonempty subsets of a metric space (X, d). Show that \bigcap A_n \neq \emptyset. (Hint: Let U_n = X-A_n)
The Attempt at a Solution
I tried showing by contradiction.
Suppose \bigcap A_n = \emptyset
Choose an open subcover U_n = X-A_n (that's supposed to be set minus but I don't know how to do \ in tex). Then \bigcup U_n = (X-A_1) \cup (X - A_2) \ldots = X - (\bigcap A_n) = X
but where's the contradiction? So X is not compact, but that goes without saying and we can't infer much from that. What am I overlooking here? Or is this the wrong approach entirely?
Thank you for your assistance.