Courses Comparing Courses for Postgrad Prep: Microfabrication vs Circuit Design

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around choosing between two courses for a sophomore math and physics major considering a future in electrical engineering and physics. The first course focuses on micro- and nanofabrication processes, offering hands-on experience in a cleanroom environment to fabricate electronic devices like transistors and LEDs. The second course emphasizes electronic circuit design, providing practical skills in circuit intuition and debugging through lab exercises, with a focus on both analog and digital circuits. Participants suggest that while both courses are valuable, the first course may offer unique skills not easily acquired elsewhere, while the second course's content might be more accessible for self-study. Ultimately, the choice hinges on the desire for specialized knowledge versus practical circuit design skills.
Sferics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am currently deciding between two courses for the coming semester. I am a sophomore math and physics major, but contemplating an electrical engineering/physics postgrad program and possible career. As such, I would like to try out a more applied, lab-type course in order to explore my options and take a bit of a respite from theory courses.

Which of these two courses do you think would give a more useful skill set for undertaking meaningful future undergraduate research and/or industry internships?

1) Introduction to micro- and nanofabrication processes used for photonic and electronic devices. Students use state-of-the-art cleanroom to fabricate transistors and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Lecures on fabrication processes, including lithography, deposition, etching, oxidation, implantation, diffusion and electrical characterization.

2) A lab-intensive introduction to electronic circuit design. Develops circuit intuition and debugging skills through daily hands-on lab exercises, each preceded by class discussion, with minimal use of mathematics and physics. Moves quickly from passive circuits, to discrete transistors, then concentrates on operational amplifiers, used to make a variety of circuits including integrators, oscillators, regulators, and filters. The digital half of the course treats analog-digital interfacing, emphasizes the use of microcontrollers and programmable logic devices (PLDs).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any advice?
 
Bump...
 
I am almost entirely unqualified to answer this, but I have heard second hand that circuits knowledge beyond first year material is incredibly useful for experimental physics.
 
I vote for number 1. Knowing number the stuff from number 1 is useful and not something you can generally get from a class or text. 2 seems like something that may be easier to pick up on your own.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top