Comparing the boil time for a copper and steel kettle

AI Thread Summary
Copper kettles boil water faster than stainless steel kettles due to their significantly higher thermal conductivity, with copper conducting heat 25.1 times better than stainless steel. The thermal conductivity of copper is 401 W/(mK), while stainless steel is only 16.3 W/(mK), allowing more heat to transfer to the water in a copper kettle. Additionally, glass has a much lower thermal conductivity, which helps trap heat within the kettle, further accelerating the water's temperature rise. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding thermal conductivity in practical applications like kettle design. This knowledge is essential for explaining why different materials affect boiling times.
gijoel
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Your friend prefers to use a glass kettle with a copper base. You notice that the water takes less time to boil when using this kettle compare to the stainless steel one. Explain the phenomenon behind this observation.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Heat is directly conducted from the base of the kettle to the water inside. The amount of heat that passes through the kettle base depends on the thermal conductivity of the material of the base. The thermal conductivity of an object is defined as “how many Watts of heat can be conducted through a one meter thickness of said material with a one Kelvin temperature difference between the two ends.” (Koolance, n.d.) giving a unit of W/(mK).

The thermal conductivity of copper is 401 W/(mk) and stainless steel is 16.3. Whilst glass’ thermal conductivity is 1.2 – 1.4. Thus copper conducts heat 25.1 times better than stainless steel, so more heat will flow through it for a given amount of time than stainless steel. Because glass’ thermal conductivity is approximately 286 times lower than copper the heat inside the kettle is trapped. Causing the water’s temperature to climb faster.

References:

Koolance, n.d., "Cooling 101: The Basics of Heat Transfer", viewed 20 August 2015, <http://koolance.com/cooling101-heat-transfer> .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
And your question is?
 
Am I right? The lecturer is being a pain in the butt and vague on her questions. Plus she hasn't really covered thermal conductivity but has done specific heat capacity
 
gijoel said:
Am I right? The lecturer is being a pain in the butt and vague on her questions. Plus she hasn't really covered thermal conductivity but has done specific heat capacity

Physics is concerned with the real world, you know. So, maybe you could answer a question like this using your knowledge of the real world. You probably have a reasonable grasp of thermal conductivity from knowing that: you can hold a mug filled with hot water, but not a glass for very long and if you touch a metal kettle or pan filled with hot water, you'll burn yourself instantly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top