How Can I Simplify Trigonometric Expressions Using Euler's Formula?

AI Thread Summary
To simplify trigonometric expressions using Euler's formula, start by expressing the cosine and sine functions in terms of exponential functions. For the expression z=cos(ωt - π/3) - cos(ωt), rewrite it as z=Re(e^{i(ωt - π/3)} - e^{iωt}). This allows for simplification through algebraic manipulation of the exponential terms. Similarly, for z=sin(ωt) - 2cos(ωt - π/4) + cos(ωt), apply the same principles using the relationships e^{iθ} = cos(θ) + i sin(θ) and Re(z) = (z + z*)/2. Utilizing these methods can significantly streamline the process of simplifying trigonometric expressions.
mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Express the following in the form z=Re[Ae^{i(\omega t+\alpha)}]

z=cos(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{3}) - cos (\omega t)
and
z=sin(\omega t) - 2cos(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{4}) + cos(\omega t)

I got a few of the problems correct by using trig. identities but it was pretty tough and two I can't get. Our teacher said you can use a tric to solve them easier but didn't have time to finish, I just know it has something to do with the polar form of e^{i \theta} I really have no clue on how to do these without using the really long method of trig. identities. Any help would be great. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
z = \textrm{Re}(e^{i(\omega t - \pi/3} - e^{i\omega t})
=\textrm{Re}( e^{i\omega t}( e^{-i\pi/3}-1))
= \textrm{Re}(( e^{-i\pi/3}-1) \;\;e^{i\omega t})

Does that help?

Don't be ashamed, it's far better to be conversant in trig than to know a few tricks.

Carl
 
Along the lines of CarlB, but without jumping straight into using Re(),
recall e^{i\theta}=\cos\theta+i\sin\theta, from which you can derive
\cos\theta=\frac{1}{2}(e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta}) and a similar expression for \sin\theta (which I left for you to do).

So, now:
<br /> z&amp;=\frac{1}{2}(e^{i[\omega t-\pi/3]}+e^{-i[\omega t-\pi/3]})-\frac{1}{2}(e^{i[\omega t]}+e^{-i[\omega t]})
then do some algebra.

Recall that Re(z)=\frac{1}{2}(z+z^*). Thus Re(e^{i\theta})=\cos\theta.
 
Thanks a lot, that makes it much more simple.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top