Complex Fourier Series & Full Fourier Series

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 11K views
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Claim: If f(x) is a REAL-valued function on x E [-L,L], then the full Fourier series is exactly equivalent to the complex Fourier series.

This is a claim stated in my textbook, but without any proof. I also searched some other textbooks, but still I have no luck of finding the proof.
I've already spent an hour thinking about how to show that this is true, but still I am not having much progress. Here is what I've got so far:

Full Fourier series is:
fourier_series.gif

where
coefficient.gif


Complex Fourier series is:
complex.gif

where
complex_coefficient.gif

And now I am having trouble with this...how can I use the last part to show that if f(x) is REAL-valued, the complex Fourier series can be reduced to the full Fourier series. Can someone please show me how to continue from here? I also don't see how a sum from negative infinity to infinity (for complex Fourier series) can possibly be reduced to a sum from 0 to infinity (for full Fourier series). It seems like I have no hope...

Homework Equations


As shown above

The Attempt at a Solution


As shown above

I am really frustrated now and any help is very much appreciated! :)
 

Attachments

  • fourier_series.gif
    fourier_series.gif
    719 bytes · Views: 593
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HallsofIvy said:
An obvious first step is to use the fact that [itex]e^{in\pi x/L}= cos(n\pi x/L)+ i sin(n\pi x/L)[/itex]. Multiply it out and use the fact that cos(-x)= cos(x), sin(-x)= sin(x).
OK, the following is what I got.
(for simplicity I am taking the interval to be from -pi to pi)

pde3.JPG


Is this a correct proof??

Thanks!
 
The claim is
"If f(x) is a REAL-valued function on x E [-L,L], then the full Fourier series is exactly equivalent to the complex Fourier series."

But nowhere in the proof have I assumed f(x) is real-valued. Is it absolutely necessary for f(x) to be REAL-valued in order to prove that the full Fourier series is exactly equivalent to the complex Fourier series??
 
HallsofIvy said:
That's because the equality of those sums does not depend upon real or complex numbers. We require that F be real valued in order to have the coefficients real numbers.
But looking at my proof above, I believe that the full Fourier series and the complex Fourier series are equivalent in general, even when f(x) is complex-valued. Right??