Component of magnetic flux density - huh?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of magnetic flux density and its components in relation to a wire carrying current in a magnetic field. The formula F = I * b * B * sin[angle] is highlighted, where B represents magnetic flux density. The confusion arises from the idea of a "component" of density, as density is typically viewed as a scalar quantity without direction. However, it is clarified that magnetic flux density can have a directional aspect due to the arrangement of magnetic flux lines per unit area. This understanding aligns with the broader principles of physics, where components can describe directional influences even in scalar quantities.
allok
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hiya

If 'b' is the length of a wire, and 'I' current running trough it, then if put a wire inside magnetic field ( not perpendicullary and also not parallel to magnetic field lines, but some angle in between the two ), then magnetic force on a wire will be:

F = I * b * B * sin[angle]

where

I ... current
B ... magnetic flux density

B * sin[angle] gives us component of magnetic flux density perpendicular to current in a wire. I'd understand if we were talking about component of velocity or component of force, but how can we talk about component of density? It just doesn't make sense.thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the component of flux density, kind of like a wind density for propellers or something. The flux density tells you how much flux is passing through an area, which you use to calculate the induced EMF.
 
It makes sense if we are talking about component of velocity of force, but it doesn't make sense that density would also have a component. Density is just density, and by my ( flawed ) logic it can't have a direction. Can someone reason with my how a density can have a component?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top